search

Aseman-Land / Cutegram

Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land. It's forked from sigram.
http://aseman.co/cutegram
GNU General Public License v3.0
387 stars 60 forks source link

Is it officially back in development? #309

Open mufeedali opened 4 years ago

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

Since there have been two new commits recently, I was hoping Cutegram is back... So, is Cutegram back for real?

rosa2 commented 4 years ago

Yes, in this times of so much need, it would be great!

dm17 commented 4 years ago

Please let it be so... And let's all harass the Telegram devs on LinkedIn... They have no excuse for not making this easier for Linux users.

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

Please let it be so... And let's all harass the Telegram devs on LinkedIn... They have no excuse for not making this easier for Linux users.

What? Why would you harass them? The Telegram devs have done nothing wrong. @dm17

dm17 commented 4 years ago

Please let it be so... And let's all harass the Telegram devs on LinkedIn... They have no excuse for not making this easier for Linux users.

What? Why would you harass them? The Telegram devs have done nothing wrong. @dm17

Oh common... Can you really not parse my text? Unfortunate & off-topic. The topic is: why won't Telegram support secret chats on Linux?

AlexWayfer commented 4 years ago

The topic is: why won't Telegram support secret chats on Linux?

Because there not enough resources for this. You can help.

dm17 commented 4 years ago

The topic is: why won't Telegram support secret chats on Linux?

Because there not enough resources for this. You can help.

Doesn't seem like it... The Telegram dev replied at the end confirming the posts in the rest of the thread, and then it was mysteriously locked & his account deleted: https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop/issues/871

giuseppemauro99 commented 4 years ago

hi everybody,

i ddidn't remember why i'm on this mailing list, can you exclude me from next conversation please?

Best regards GM

Il giorno lun 15 giu 2020 alle ore 22:35 dm17 notifications@github.com ha scritto:

The topic is: why won't Telegram support secret chats on Linux?

Because there not enough resources for this. You can help.

Doesn't seem like it... The Telegram dev replied at the end confirming the posts in the rest of the thread, and then it was mysteriously locked & his account deleted: telegramdesktop/tdesktop#871 https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop/issues/871

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Aseman-Land/Cutegram/issues/309#issuecomment-644374107, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHMBSUA5KPHPGXWJDF7SPLRW2AXJANCNFSM4JVCRSIQ .

AlexWayfer commented 4 years ago

i ddidn't remember why i'm on this mailing list, can you exclude me from next conversation please?

There is unsubscribe link in your quoted message:

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#309 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHMBSUA5KPHPGXWJDF7SPLRW2AXJANCNFSM4JVCRSIQ

No, we can't exclude you, do it yourself, please.

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

The topic is: why won't Telegram support secret chats on Linux?

Because there not enough resources for this. You can help.

Doesn't seem like it... The Telegram dev replied at the end confirming the posts in the rest of the thread, and then it was mysteriously locked & his account deleted: https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop/issues/871

Secret chats on desktop brings up too many questions that the TG devs have been clear about. While I don't agree with their decision, I do agree with their reasoning.

dm17 commented 4 years ago

That doesn't make sense. TG devs have been clear about a question such that secret chat cannot be implemented on Linux? Furthermore, as you can see from my post, the last post by the Telegram dev was confirming what the users want and that it is a good idea... And then deleted his GitHub account.

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

That doesn't make sense. TG devs have been clear about a question such that secret chat cannot be implemented on Linux? Furthermore, as you can see from my post, the last post by the Telegram dev was confirming what the users want and that it is a good idea... And then deleted his GitHub account.

They have explained why it's troublesome to implement. And I think I can relate to that.

And since when is this a Linux-specific issue? It isn't.

There was already an explanation on one of the issues regarding what happened to the deleted account. It was a non-org TG desktop account. Besides, why does that even matter?

dm17 commented 4 years ago

That doesn't make sense. TG devs have been clear about a question such that secret chat cannot be implemented on Linux? Furthermore, as you can see from my post, the last post by the Telegram dev was confirming what the users want and that it is a good idea... And then deleted his GitHub account.

They have explained why it's troublesome to implement. And I think I can relate to that.

And since when is this a Linux-specific issue? It isn't.

There was already an explanation on one of the issues regarding what happened to the deleted account. It was a non-org TG desktop account. Besides, why does that even matter?

Where did they explain why it is difficult to implement on Linux while it being easy to maintain on OSX & Android?

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

Where did they explain why it is difficult to implement on Linux while it being easy to maintain on OSX & Android?

It's difficult to implement on the current codebase shared by Windows and Linux. So again, Linux is not alone here.

dm17 commented 4 years ago

Where did they explain why it is difficult to implement on Linux while it being easy to maintain on OSX & Android?

It's difficult to implement on the current codebase shared by Windows and Linux. So again, Linux is not alone here.

OSX and Linux are fairly similar, however.

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

OSX and Linux are fairly similar, however.

How similar two operating systems are has nothing to do with this. The macOS client is an entirely different code base written in Swift and it's very very very "made for macOS". And I think it makes sense because Apple provides enough ways to ensure it's safe, unlike the more open platforms of Windows and Linux.

dm17 commented 4 years ago

OSX and Linux are fairly similar, however.

How similar two operating systems are has nothing to do with this. The macOS client is an entirely different code base written in Swift and it's very very very "made for macOS". And I think it makes sense because Apple provides enough ways to ensure it's safe, unlike the more open platforms of Windows and Linux.

Ya not gonna argue that point. And I don't think it is Cutegram's responsibility. But it should be easy to agree that Telegram's Linux client should have this functionality considering that they maintain multiple clients or the same platforms with all duplicated functionality.

mufeedali commented 4 years ago

Ya not gonna argue that point. And I don't think it is Cutegram's responsibility. But it should be easy to agree that Telegram's Linux client should have this functionality considering that they maintain multiple clients or the same platforms with all duplicated functionality.

That, I can agree with. But still no reason to harass devs because it's a hard enough job as is, don't make it more difficult for them.