Closed curio-sitas closed 1 year ago
I'm not sure why the CI hasn't run. The workflow should run on any pull request to the main branch, and I can't find a setting on GitHub that allows this for new contributors or an option to override the default.
I'm not sure why the CI hasn't run. The workflow should run on any pull request to the main branch, and I can't find a setting on GitHub that allows this for new contributors or an option to override the default.
Look's like the CI needs more approvals ?
Look's like the CI needs more approvals ?
As far as I can tell, that isn't the issue. Approvals aren't required as part of branch protection for this repo. I looked over the relevant documentation, but there is no option to "Workflow(s) awaiting approval" section. It looks like the checks are still just waiting to be run.
I'll try making a commit to see if that moves things along.
@curio-sitas, if the workflow doesn't start soon, I'll just bypass the branch protection and merge everything manually. Thanks again for your contribution!
By the way, I plan to change how the spinner is generated. Instead of shelling out to make a new process, I'll be using distributed threads. As a result, I might not be able to approve major changes until after I push my own. But localized revisions like this one are always appreciated!
@curio-sitas, if the workflow doesn't start soon, I'll just bypass the branch protection and merge everything manually. Thanks again for your contribution!
By the way, I plan to change how the spinner is generated. Instead of shelling out to make a new process, I'll be using distributed threads. As a result, I might not be able to approve major changes until after I push my own. But localized revisions like this one are always appreciated!
I'm interesting to see that ! Also, in the same mind than this PR i am interested to add more Spinners in the Dict (#36)
@curio-sitas My bad. I forgot that I had disabled the workflow from the actions menu, since I was planning to make breaking changes. I wish there was some indicator from this screen...
Thanks for your help. I'm rather new to Julia, as you could probably tell from all of my ifelse
conditions. So, I'm always grateful for any contributions!
Defining Spinners in a Dict avoids to write ifelse conditions and compacts the code of
get_named_string()
.