Closed mindcrime closed 10 years ago
I don't like license headers as they pollute the source code but I added a LICENSE.md and chose GPLv3. Is that sufficient for your purposes or do you need a different license?
:+1: GPLv3 sounds good to me. I think the important thing is just having a license, so people who discover the project know whether or not they can even use it at all.
Unless I'm just missing it, there does not appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the repo that specifies the license the code is covered by. And the one source file I picked at random did not have a license header either. Net-net, no one really knows if they can use the code in your project, or under what terms they can do so. I suggest adding a LICENSE file to the root of the repo that specifies the license.