Closed eLtMosen closed 2 years ago
I find the omission of the leading 0 for numbers like
0.488
=>.488
a wee bit less readable, but it's a minor complaint and it's consistent within the watchface.
Ha, i always found the 0 omission to be kind of smart when i first saw someone else doing it. Maybe for you its a bit less readable because of being used to the leading 0? Anyway, good point, have not thought about that. I was figuring the opposite actually since it shortens code lines by some chars eventually. And reading from left to right should be a tad faster? I was planning to do the 0 omission consistently from now on, thinking its super leet. And now you, the type of guy i seek to impress with such nifty things, points out a problem. I am devastated :joy_cat: Ahhh, trade-offs everywhere.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's a minor difference, and I'm sure I can live with it either way.
Cool :) like beroset, I think the leading 0 is slightly more readable and I don't think we should optimize for code length but rather for readability. That being said it's really minor and we can absolutely deal with it ahah
Oh and thanks for the review beroset! This helps a lot when other folks review PRs, much appreciated.