AsteroidOS / unofficial-watchfaces

Database of community-made watchfaces for AsteroidOS.
51 stars 32 forks source link

Fix and optimize analog-scientific-v2 #84

Closed eLtMosen closed 2 years ago

eLtMosen commented 2 years ago
eLtMosen commented 2 years ago

I find the omission of the leading 0 for numbers like 0.488 => .488 a wee bit less readable, but it's a minor complaint and it's consistent within the watchface.

Ha, i always found the 0 omission to be kind of smart when i first saw someone else doing it. Maybe for you its a bit less readable because of being used to the leading 0? Anyway, good point, have not thought about that. I was figuring the opposite actually since it shortens code lines by some chars eventually. And reading from left to right should be a tad faster? I was planning to do the 0 omission consistently from now on, thinking its super leet. And now you, the type of guy i seek to impress with such nifty things, points out a problem. I am devastated :joy_cat: Ahhh, trade-offs everywhere.

beroset commented 2 years ago

I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's a minor difference, and I'm sure I can live with it either way.

FlorentRevest commented 2 years ago

Cool :) like beroset, I think the leading 0 is slightly more readable and I don't think we should optimize for code length but rather for readability. That being said it's really minor and we can absolutely deal with it ahah

FlorentRevest commented 2 years ago

Oh and thanks for the review beroset! This helps a lot when other folks review PRs, much appreciated.