Closed eteq closed 5 years ago
cc @sfeeney - could you please confirm you're OK with changing this?
(should have noted in the description that I did briefly chat with @sfeeney about this, but should also get confirmation here since he was busy actually teaching the tutorial at the time, of course!)
Oh, if he was looped in it already, I'm happy to hit merge any time.
Hmm, looking into the notebooks I would also suggest to change the scipy imports. Keeping the full spelling of the scipy and numpy imports would make the notebook more clear I think.
Hi all!
I'm happy to change whatever imports desired to maintain clarity. I just used my standard shorthand as we were low on time :)
Cheers!
Stephen
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:45 PM Brigitta Sipocz notifications@github.com wrote:
Hmm, looking into the notebooks I would also suggest to change the scipy imports. Keeping the full spelling of the scipy and numpy imports would make the notebook more clear I think.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/AstroHackWeek/AstroHackWeek2019/pull/19?email_source=notifications&email_token=AB34WEALWTJWUT3YWDAD723QGZQNFA5CNFSM4IRBF2A2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5K2VBY#issuecomment-525707911, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB34WED6AJ22TAHJDTQXAODQGZQNFANCNFSM4IRBF2AQ .
Thanks both. I'm merging this now, but may open another PR for the other imports.
This PR makes the minor suggestion of changing the pyplot imports in the day3 bayes exercises to use
plt
as the short form ofpyplot
instead of ofmp
- this is the traditional convention the matplotlib team generally recommends.