Closed Thorinori closed 5 months ago
Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:
Proper conventional commit scoping:
If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin
If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error
[x] Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above
[x] README
is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url>
unless they are inside a [title](url)
[x] Proper usage of opts
table rather than setting things up with the config
function.
📑 Description
Transferred plugin ownership, so updated the spec to point to the new/transferred repo
ℹ Additional Information
This is in conjunction with some plugin updates for more advanced use of harp itself, none of which require further changes beyond pointing to the new repo as far as I am aware.