Closed Cretezy closed 1 month ago
Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:
Proper conventional commit scoping:
If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin
If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error
[x] Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above
[x] README
is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url>
unless they are inside a [title](url)
[x] Proper usage of opts
table rather than setting things up with the config
function.
📑 Description
checkOnSave
is supposed to be a boolean: https://rust-analyzer.github.io/manual.html#rust-analyzer.checkOnSaveThe right place to put
command = "clippy"
is undercheck
: https://rust-analyzer.github.io/manual.html#clippy