Closed zackmdavis closed 8 years ago
... except that CI doesn't know that the example needs the stats
feature (see discussion on #130).
I love the context for the example! I have a few comments for the example code. I think it needs some more inline comments and hand holding. Maybe we can try to separate out the data-creation and the machine learning parts too. But really it only needs some mild changes.
I guess the bigger issue is the feature flag... I'll see if I can find a way to fix that using the stats
feature (maybe we can hide the example behind the feature flag?). Otherwise it might be best to just use the rand
crate here for the Gaussians?
OK; sometime in the next few days I'll add comments and change it to use rand::distributions::normal::Normal
OK; sometime in the next few days I'll add comments and change it to use rand::distributions::normal::Normal
Great, thank you!
I've merged in #133 which has some breaking changes (going into the 0.5.0 release). Let me know if you need any help resolving. It's mostly modifications to trait imports and some behind-the-scenes naive bayes changes (shouldn't affect you).
(updated and force-pushed)
OK; more commentary later
@zackmdavis did you need anything from me for this?
Not rushing you at all - take as long as you like!
Alternatively, merge now and accept improvements later if I (or—we can unrealistically hope—someone else) happen to get around to it??
This in the matter of #128.