search

AtlantaBotanicalGarden / gap-analysis-shiny-app

2 stars 0 forks source link

GBIF query #6

Closed dcarver1 closed 5 months ago

dcarver1 commented 6 months ago

So there appears to be multiple sets of unique column names for species...

See Vitis acerfolia : 5372375 species. for one that works.

Vitis arizonica : 5372421 species, for one that does not work

We need to some conditional work in handling this varability within the etl_gbif_occ_data function.

Though I have to admit it is strange to see this different in column names coming from the same source?

dcarver1 commented 6 months ago

@Jonathan-Gore If you have time to take a look at this behavior let me know. most why is there is a difference schema between difference species calls? Hoping I'm just messing something up on my end.

Jonathan-Gore commented 6 months ago

We'll talk later tomorrow/this week when you get the chance. I looks like Vitis arizonica has no occurrences in GBIF. I may not being fully understanding the issue, but yes definitely etl_gbif_occ_data likely needs many aspects of validations integrated.

Jonathan-Gore commented 6 months ago

@dcarver1 I believe my current PR for the "gbif-backbone-select-fix" branch closes this issue. Feel free to close after testing/merging.

dcarver1 commented 5 months ago

The gbif query is working really well