Open CamSlatyer opened 1 year ago
Will need to check this in test as well => Currently in Dev, both the plant and animal genus are assigned Seabream as a common name from CAAB
Hi – still an error… do we need to discuss?
From: Sherrin-ALA @.> Sent: Tuesday, 25 July 2023 2:05 PM To: AtlasOfLivingAustralia/Taxonomic-Issues-Register_new @.> Cc: Slatyer, Cam (NCMI, Black Mountain) @.>; Assign @.> Subject: Re: [AtlasOfLivingAustralia/Taxonomic-Issues-Register_new] Species page and data issues - Homonym - Monotaxis (Issue #152)
Will need to check this in test. Currently in Dev, both the plant and animal genus are assigned Seabream as a common name from CAAB
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/Taxonomic-Issues-Register_new/issues/152#issuecomment-1649067597, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5GVKFOYBJBNND5JQABZ5RDXR5AWHANCNFSM6AAAAAA2WMYEF4. You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
The primary issue with the fishes matching to the plant records is because the fish species Monotaxis heterodon -https://bie.ala.org.au/species/37351032#classification - has been attached to the plant genus rather than the animal genus in the taxonomy. In production, the species was coming from CAAB, and that isn't a problem in the development taxonomy as CAAB is vernacular only. However, M. heterodon doesn't appear in the taxonomy at all in dev.
Monotaxis is both a plant and a marine fish. On the plant page, https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/6475319#tab_recordsView the images are correct but the data is a mixture of fish and plant. The fish page appears correct https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/6f2f14ef-6751-42cf-8abe-539572de382f#tab_recordsView