Some SAM records are only being matched to genus despite the records providing a valid scientificName as well valid genus and specificEpithet fields. E.g. this record is correctly matched:
The 1st record was provided with genus and specificEpithet but no scientificName. The second record was provided with all 3 but the scientificName field contains an unrecognised character:
Litoria ewingii (Dum�ril & Bibron, 1841)
Fix is to be tolerant of the non-UTF-8 char (ignore it maybe) and to check for genus and specificEpithet in order to confirm the match.
djtfmartin
commented
6 years ago
Some SAM records are only being matched to
genusdespite the records providing a validscientificNameas well validgenusandspecificEpithetfields. E.g. this record is correctly matched:http://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/97ceb83a-b2a2-4cb9-914b-369d76eac47d
but this one is not:
http://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/6f15ef99-9f1c-47fa-aeed-fb311780b490
The 1st record was provided with
genusandspecificEpithetbut noscientificName. The second record was provided with all 3 but thescientificNamefield contains an unrecognised character:Litoria ewingii (Dum�ril & Bibron, 1841)
Fix is to be tolerant of the non-UTF-8 char (ignore it maybe) and to check for
genusandspecificEpithetin order to confirm the match.