Closed kylie-m closed 3 days ago
The moment we entered anything remotely complex into a filter value
the chance that this would work was reduced. Given the very wide variety of inputs possible, this is the most robust solution:
In test, please test.
Thanks Adam!
@peggynewman I gave this a try on test and it's looking ok to me. Since you initially raised it, could you also give it a try and confirm you're happy with the changes?
In an all data query (https://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/search?q=) with the DQ filters on, there are an expected 1.1 million- ish records excluded based on record type (ie basis of record).
When you click on the filter to see the excluded records, the query doesn't return the 1.1 million-ish records, instead only 279 records, and this seems to be related to how the query is parsed. The FOSSIL_SPECIMEN make it in, but not the "Environmental DNA" contentType
https://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrence/search?q=&qualityProfile=ALA&disableAllQualityFilters=true&fq=basisOfRecord%3A%22FOSSIL_SPECIMEN%22+%28%2BbasisOfRecord%3AMATERIAL_SAMPLE+%2BcontentTypes%3AEnvironmental+DNA%29#tab_mapView