Closed sughics closed 9 months ago
Removed duplicates https://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/doi-service/pull/88
Some feedback on the human readable data quality filters please
Some feedback on the human readable data quality filters please
@peggynewman
Hi @adam-collins, @sughics I think we should represent both the query filter code and the human explanation. The issue was that just the query filter code was represented twice. I don't think we should remove it all together.
filter code returned in the pull request.
The DQ filters have a nicer description field: https://data-quality-service.ala.org.au/filters/92
eg Exclude records with location related data quality assertions Exclude records with open user assertions
Looking at https://doi-test.ala.org.au/doi/48cfd92e-c79d-4785-8c15-f29c13838a31
Also, "Authors" should probably not be "ALA", we are not technically authors of the data, is this a DOI requirement? It doesn't send a good message in the UI.
Also, the Datasets list lists Data Resource names, but also all of the consumers (institutions, collections, data provider) records making the count look bad. Limit these to just the data resources (in this example, 4 out of 16)
The license field could be aggregated, it repeats the license for all 4 datasets which is the same, looks a bit iffy
Authors
is the author of the DOI, not the data. It a mandatory DOI field. I will exclude it from the page.This update is now on doi-test for review.
Raised by @peggynewman
DOI page should have human readable explanations for the filters. The text at the top replicates the text in the table. Bad look.