Closed nickdos closed 3 years ago
I'm not sure if I've tested this correctly but I'm getting different results between the search results page and the map view with the scientific name facet selected.
Steps:
Note the numbers found and that there are more Hakea arborescens than Hakea teretifolia
There is now more Hakea teretifolia occurrences being found than Hakea arborescens
@adam-collins this is probably more related to the test environment set up. During the stand up many of us were surprised to see an instance of spatial hub sitting in the biocache-dq server. We are assuming this is now outdated. Could you please point to a more up to date spatial hub/service so we can confirm Robina's findings are no longer an issue?
Changed config of biocache-dq-test to open spatial-test. Changed config of spatial-test to use nci3-biocache-service. Still incorrect.
Remaining counts issue is in spatial-hub https://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/spatial-hub/issues/411
@javier-molina - I don't think this is blocking the release of biocache-service or hubs, so should it be moved to To do/on hold
column?
Legend and facet outputs are now consistent
Other scientific name count for legend call has substantially dropped as a result
Reported by a user https://support.ehelp.edu.au/a/tickets/110958 (see #460 for screenshots).
Looking at the output of the
legend
endpoint https://biocache-ws.ala.org.au/ws/webportal/legend?cm=scientificName&q=lsid%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fid.biodiversity.org.au%2Ftaxon%2Fapni%2F51300181&type=application/jsonThe first entry is
Hakea arborescens
with3724
results. The last entry isOther scientificName
with81745
results.Compare this with a facets search: https://biocache-ws.ala.org.au/ws/occurrence/facets?q=lsid%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fid.biodiversity.org.au%2Ftaxon%2Fapni%2F51300181&facets=taxon_name
Hakea arborescens
is the 5th entry (same count). The first 4 names I would expect to be present in the legend output but are missing.