What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create table with at the end invisible but searchable column
2. Use for example { sSelector: "#searchcol3", type: "select"} on this column
3. This problem is similar to ISSUE 125 or 88
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected : Table should show result based on this select
Instead : Search is made globally in the table, the search field is fill with
the option select value. This is because the search is not passed with the
appropriate column number (take a look at the query string paramater in your
network). So the wrong values are displayed in the table.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Ver. 1.5.1.
How to resolve :
1 - Add rel attribut to select based on col number
change this :
var r = '<select class="search_init select_filter"><option value=""
class="search_init">' + sLabel + '</option>';
to this :
var r = '<select class="search_init select_filter" rel="'+ i +'"><option value="" class="search_init" >' + sLabel + '</option>';
2 - Let's use this rel attribut
In function fnCreateColumnSelect() at the end
change iColumn:
if (bRegex)
oTable.fnFilter($(this).val(), iColumn, bRegex); //Issue 41
else
oTable.fnFilter(unescape($(this).val()), iColumn); //Issue 25
fnOnFiltered();
});
if (currentFilter != null && currentFilter != "")//Issue 81
oTable.fnFilter(unescape(currentFilter), iColumn);
to this :
if (bRegex)
oTable.fnFilter($(this).val(), $(this).attr('rel'), bRegex); //Issue 41
else
oTable.fnFilter(unescape($(this).val()), $(this).attr('rel')); //Issue 25
fnOnFiltered();
});
if (currentFilter != null && currentFilter != "")//Issue 81
oTable.fnFilter(unescape(currentFilter), $(this).attr('rel'));
Hope it work for all,
Criticism welcome.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by adrien.f...@gmail.com on 30 Jan 2014 at 5:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
adrien.f...@gmail.com
on 30 Jan 2014 at 5:30