Open robeastwood-agency opened 3 years ago
LOINC contains on the an answer list in this space. See below, this represents the answers to the question of what is the pressure injury staging (LL5203-6): | Answer | Answer ID |
---|---|---|
Stage 1 Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin | LA29668-3 | |
Stage 2 Pressure Injury: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis | LA29669-1 | |
Stage 3 Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin loss | LA29670-9 | |
Stage 4 Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss | LA29671-7 | |
Unstageable Pressure Injury: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss | LA29672-5 | |
Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration | LA29673-3 |
Analysis:
Conclusion: Notwithstanding that the concepts are analogous to the PPPIA promoted concepts, SNOMED-CT remains as the preference in Australia to represent clinical concepts. Therefore, these LOINC codes are not recommended for use in this value set. No requirement nor benefit is identified at this time for a concept map with these LOINC codes. However, should a future need be raised, it would be straight forwards to add one/more later.
Wound Grade Concepts code system is implemented in the HL7 International Wound Assessment FHIR Implementation Guide, with the PI-specific constrained National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Classification System value set.
The implementation guide notes that this use of concepts is temporary and will be replaced by 'Solor Extension' SNOMED CT terms when available.
Analysis:
Conclusion: There is no identified value in adopting or mapping to this terminology in an Australian context.
The ICD is hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO), used worldwide, and is promoted as the "global standard for diagnostic health information". The WHO have released the ICD-11 version as of Jan 2021.
The following codes are available within ICD-10 (International):
Code | Description | Suitability |
---|---|---|
L89.0 | Stage I decubitus ulcer and pressure area | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.1 | Stage II decubitus ulcer | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.2 | Stage III decubitus ulcer | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.3 | Stage IV decubitus ulcer | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.9 | Decubitus ulcer and pressure area, unspecified | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury |
The following codes are available within ICD-10-AM (Australian Modification), sourced from the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline The International Guideline.
Code | Description | Suitability |
---|---|---|
L89.0 | Pressure injury, stage I | Equivalent and suitable for the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.1 | Pressure injury, stage II | Equivalent and suitable for the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.2 | Pressure injury, stage III | Equivalent and suitable for the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.3 | Pressure injury, stage IV | Equivalent and suitable for the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.4 | Pressure injury, unstageable, so stated | Equivalent and suitable for the preferred concept of pressure injury |
L89.5 | Suspected deep tissue injury, depth unknown, so stated | Equivalent and suitable for the preferred concept of pressure injury |
The following codes are available within ICD-11:
Code | Description | Inclusion |
---|---|---|
EH90.0 | Pressure ulceration grade 1 | pressure injury stage 1 |
EH90.1 | Pressure ulceration grade 2 | pressure injury stage 2 |
EH90.2 | Pressure ulceration grade 3 | pressure injury stage 3 |
EH90.3 | Pressure ulceration grade 4 | pressure injury stage 4 |
EH90.4 | Suspected deep pressure-induced tissue damage, depth unknown | |
EH90.5 | Pressure ulceration, ungradable | pressure injury with depth unknown |
EH90.Z | Pressure ulcer of unspecified grade | pressure injury |
Analysis:
Conclusion: given its scope, ICD (in any flavour) is not recommended for use as the basis of the PICS. However, given the widespread use in Australian hospital reporting, it is recommended to develop concept maps to the ICD-10-AM equivalents.
SNOMED-CT is the most comprehensive multilingual health terminology in the world, with the primary purpose of directly supporting clinical data entry in a patient record. It is the preferred national solution for clinical terminology, endorsed by the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC).
The following codes are currently available (as at October 2021) in SNOMED CT to support grading of pressure ulcers: | Code | Preferred term | Suitability |
---|---|---|---|
421076008 | Pressure ulcer stage 1 (disorder) | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury | |
420324007 | Pressure ulcer stage 2 (disorder) | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury | |
421927004 | Pressure ulcer stage 3 (disorder) | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury | |
420597008 | Pressure ulcer stage 4 (disorder) | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury | |
421594008 | Nonstageable pressure ulcer (disorder) | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury | |
723071003 | Pressure injury of deep tissue (disorder) | Not fully equivalent to the preferred concept of pressure injury |
These above concepts that are not fully equivalent will be replaced with Pressure Injury concepts for the January 2022 release. The SNOMED CT concepts for Pressure Injury will provide the concepts for mapping to the six Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) Pressure Injury concepts.
Analysis:
Conclusion: clear front-runner to base the PICS terminology on SNOMED-CT. If and when concept maps are needed, SNOMED-CT would be the front-runner to be used as the ConceptMap source.
(updated following review comments below)
To support the above scenarios, it is recommended to develop:
(updated following peer review comments below)
Following first pass peer review of the solution recommendations, updates have been made to the analysis and proposal sections.
I agree with and endorse:
Recommend:
Updated above comments based on revised solution recommendations.
There are SNOMED CT concepts for Pressure Ulcers: 421076008 | Pressure ulcer stage 1 (disorder)| 420324007 | Pressure ulcer stage 2 (disorder)| 421927004 | Pressure ulcer stage 3 (disorder)| 420597008 | Pressure ulcer stage 4 (disorder)| 421594008 | Nonstageable pressure ulcer (disorder)| 723071003 | Pressure injury of deep tissue (disorder)| However, these concepts will be replaced with Pressure Injury concepts for the January 2022 release The SNOMED CT concepts for Pressure Injury will provide the concepts for mapping to the six Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) Pressure Injury concepts
Thank you Rob, for the comprehensive work. I agree with and endorse:
Re this Solution Recommendation: "the 2 options of 'unstageable pressure injury' and 'deep tissue pressure injury' are both used when one of the classification grades cannot be applied (ie grades 1-4) as the PI has not yet developed to a state where it can be graded; and respective detail in the code descriptions from the clinical guidelines is sufficient for an informed assessor to choose."
Stage 1 to Stage 4 of the PPPIA concepts are ordinal in nature, indicating progressive seriousness in morphological and pathological changes/damage to the skin and related structures.
Unstageable Pressure Injury: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration
The developer of these concepts (unstageable; deep tissue) may not have found a way to rank the morphological and pathological injuries described in these two concepts to adequately differentiate them from the Stage 4 injury (Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss); and hence did not assign rankings to these two concepts But the concept definitions provide sufficient clarity to allow for morphological and pathological (non-ordinal) staging by clinical users
Suggest remove this statement
Hi Rob, Thanks for the changes. One quick question on LOINC codes - In the LOINC section, the conclusion states that: "Notwithstanding that the concepts are analogous to the PPPIA promoted concepts, SNOMED-CT remains as the preference in Australia to represent clinical concepts. Therefore, these LOINC codes are not recommended for use in this value set. No requirement nor benefit is identified at this time for a concept map with these LOINC codes. However, should a future need be raised, it would be straight forwards to add one/more later."
This recommendation does not seem to exclude the use of this LOINC code LL5203-6: "on the question of what is the pressure injury staging (the question of what is the pressure injury staging (LL5203-6))" If that is correct, can the LL5203-6 LOINC code can still be used?
For example: Observation.code The code value can be: LL5203-6 Observation.value[x]:valuecodeableConcept SNOMED CT codes for pressure injury stages can be used when released in January 2022
It will be useful to include additional clarification.
Response to comment 3 (@robeastwood-agency): The use of LOINC for Observation.code is certainly not ruled out by the above designs and actually these terminology artefacts would remain ignorant/agnostic to what is used outside of the binding. My understanding is also that LOINC is likely the preferred choice for the 'question' as you state.
I support the use of SNOMED CT for this content. As noted by Stephen, there is work being done by SNOMED International to remodel applicable concepts, so would suggest using the new content once it's been released. It will be interesting to see what terms and modelling are chosen.
For Australian use, there appears to be some inconsistent use of pressure injury classification values. I've not seen the full guidelines due to it not being freely available but the "Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Quick Reference Guide" recommend PIs are classified and notes three main systems for use: International NPUAP/EPUAP Pressure Ulcer Classification System (2009, 2014), WHO ICD-11 (2018), and NPUAP Classification System (April 2016).
I didn't see any concepts defined directly by PPPIA other than their collaborative work in the Quick Reference Guide. The concept definitions provided in the introduction of this issue seem to most closely align with the NPUAP Classification System (April 2016). If there is a direct source, can you please provide? Thanks.
The 2020 NSQHS Standards Fact Sheet - Preventing pressure injuries and wound management, includes the recommendation to "Stage the pressure injury using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) / European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) 2014 Pressure Injury Classification System". This appears to be reflected in the guidelines by state health departments. I checked a few: NSW, WA, VIC. This system is also supported by Wounds Australia. In contrast, RCH staging guidelines reflect NPUAP Classification System (April 2016). I haven't see evidence to suggest Australia has moved to the NPUAP Classification System (April 2016) like it appears the US have done.
ValueSet element | Suggested value |
---|---|
title | Pressure Injury Classification |
canonical url | https://healthterminologies.gov.au/fhir/ValueSet/pressure-injury-classification-1 |
version | 1.0.0 |
description | The Pressure Injury Classification value set includes values that may be used to represent the severity of a pressure injury. |
compose | system: "http://snomed.info/sct"; the SNOMED CT concepts that are equivalent to the PICS concepts as endorsed by Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA): Pressure Injury Stage 1, Pressure Injury Stage 2, Pressure Injury Stage 3, Pressure Injury Stage 4, Unstageable Pressure Injury depth unknown, Deep Tissue Pressure Injury depth unknown |
Associated FHIR Terminology Request: FTR-1282
ValueSet element | Suggested value |
---|---|
title | ICD-10-AM Pressure Injury Classification |
canonical url | https://healthterminologies.gov.au/fhir/ValueSet/icd10am-pressure-injury-classification-1 |
version | 1.0.0 |
description | The ICD-10-AM Pressure Injury Classification value set includes values that may be used to represent the severity of a pressure injury. |
compose | The ICD-10-AM concepts that are equivalent to the PICS concepts as endorsed by Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA): Pressure Injury Stage 1, Pressure Injury Stage 2, Pressure Injury Stage 3, Pressure Injury Stage 4, Unstageable Pressure Injury depth unknown, Deep Tissue Pressure Injury depth unknown |
Associated FHIR Terminology Request: FTR-1287
These will be progressed via internal terminology tasks as per the BAU publication schedule; this GitHub issue will be kept up to date as the designs mature. This content has been included here as an indication of the initial direction of this content; review and analysis by a terminology analyst when authoring is necessary.
The two concept maps:
Terminology designs in peer review
Endorse the value set and concept map designs to go into the FTR pending terminology analyst approval.
Also endorse the value set and concept map design for progression to FTR
Prerequisites
The feature
Value set(s) to representing pressure injury classification is needed to support exchange of wound management information (see GitHub #119) between healthcare providers, and between healthcare providers and the My Health Record system.
The values are to cover the concepts in the Pressure Injury Classification System (PICS), and are expected to be drawn from SNOMED CT as the preferred national solution for clinical terminology.
The value set(s) will be referenced directly in FHIR and CDA specifications that support the exchange of wound management information in forthcoming aged care specifications, and is intended to be considered for inclusion in other continuity of care specifications such as Discharge Summary, Referral or care planning.
The usage scenario is the electronic exchange of current, valid, pressure injury information documented as part of an assessment by a healthcare provider.
Concept definitions
A pressure injury (PI), is a type of wound that has localised damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue as a result of pressure or pressure in combination with shear, usually occurring over a bony prominence but may also be related to a medical device or other objects[^1].
[^1]: European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline The International Guideline. Emily Haesler (Ed.). EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA: 3rd edition 2019
What it actually enables people to do
Provide a publicly accessible FHIR representation of the internationally agreed set of values in a governed manner that is reusable in an Australian context.
How awesome would it be?
Pretty awesome - a small but significant step into the representation of broader concepts, to support exchange of wound management clinical concepts.
The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care have declared PI as a leading hospital acquired complication and is specifically called out in the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standard: Comprehensive Care Standard, 2020. The 3 related actions require that healthcare organisations establish systems and processes for pressure injury prevention and wound management that are consistent with best-practice guidelines. This includes the documentation of the level of tissue loss using an agreed international classification system.
An international collaboration between the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), the US National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) and the Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) resulted in the publication of the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline The International Guideline (3rd edition 2019), which includes the recommended PI classification system.
Additional context
Some materials commenting on clinical terms for interest - not directly related to the value set definition.