dtr-agency
commented
4 years ago The MHR (#76) and Atomic will be two flavours of the exact same report. So for elements included in both the same exact value is expected - there will be three main differences:
- MHR uses Bundle type=document with a Composition as the grouper
- Atomic will not be a Bundle - it will be included as a DiagnosticReport that references other content in a way that makes it easy to see the FHIR structure associated with the primary narrative rendering. Therefore this example is not constructed to show a packaged up instance of a payload on the wire, or how individual resources might reference each other in a server.
- Same patient, author, etc. (same values for the clinical/business elements that are present in both) but the elements included will differ (some added or removed between scenarios); and of course the technical elements will have different values e.g. unique ids as the ids are for the resources as entries into the Bundle not the business identifier or unique meta.lastUpdated etc.
robeastwood-agency
Prerequisites
The feature
Change description
This example of a "Full Blood Count plus ESR" report is to present a pathology report with atomic data (observation) with and attached pdf. This report is a representation of a report issued by a diagnostic service provider with atomic content (observations with values) and elements of clinical relevance for the electronic exchange of pathology reports between healthcare providers in Australia.
What it actually enables people to do
This example will enable developers to view the structure and content of a suitable pathology report with atomic content (observation(s) with value(s)) and an attached pdf that is suitable for the electronic exchange of pathology reports between healthcare providers in Australia.
Mockups
If applicable, add screenshots or mockups to help explain the issue / feature.
How awesome would it be?
Many developers find examples useful especially if one similar to their use case can be found i.e. the more and varied examples the better.
Workarounds
A developer could always read the specification and Diagnostics implementation guide and develop their own content.
Additional context
This example has 2 separate orderable tests with the Full Blood Count being a panel of tests and the ESR being a single test where both orderables are reported on the Full Blood Count report.