Closed benfulcher closed 7 years ago
That’s a good point - and we could use the short version in the text.
On 4 Aug 2017, at 13:19, Ben Fulcher notifications@github.com wrote:
Maybe we should go ahead and use the term “correlated gene expression”…? Coexpression has connotations of pairs of genes. The same term ‘correlated gene expression' was used by Richiardi… Worth thinking about in context of worm. cf. also in mouse: Mills, B. D. et al. Correlated gene expression and anatomical communication support synchronized brain activity in the mouse functional connectome. bioRxiv 167304 (2017). doi:10.1101/167304 http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/167304 — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/AurinaBMH/WORMPlosCBtemplate/issues/80, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AORxFCZ8CfLbW3rfX1miq4JTwFgaWOY9ks5sUo3TgaJpZM4OtOxO.
I've tried to use correlated gene expression (CGE) now, and avoided "coexpression" throughout -- see how it flows
Maybe we should go ahead and use the term “correlated gene expression”…? Coexpression has connotations of pairs of genes. The same term ‘correlated gene expression' was used by Richiardi… Worth thinking about in context of worm. cf. also in mouse: Mills, B. D. et al. Correlated gene expression and anatomical communication support synchronized brain activity in the mouse functional connectome. bioRxiv 167304 (2017). doi:10.1101/167304