Add the ability to handle recursive objects to seligimus.python.decorators.standard_representation.standard_representation.
For example:
class Foo():
__init__(self, bar: Optional[Bar] = None):
bar: Optional[Bar] = bar
@standard_representation
def __repr__(self) -> str: pass
class Bar():
__init__(self, foo: Optional[Foo] = None):
foo: Optional[Foo] = foo
@standard_representation
def __repr__(self) -> str: pass
foo: Foo = Foo()
bar: Bar = Bar(foo)
foo.bar = bar
assert repr(foo) == 'Foo(bar=Bar(<..>))'
I like the idea of using some sort of "dot" syntax to refer to other relative objects.
It would be nice to have a way to output actual runnable code for the repr at some point too. This would require a recursive constructor, or a "reference constructor" to enable you to make any sort of graph structure. For example, if you had a class Foo with two attributes, bar and baz and both attributes where assigned to the same object, then you would want your repr to tell you that they are the same object. Maybe the reference constructor could use a dictionary specification of the self-referencing structure?
Add the ability to handle recursive objects to
seligimus.python.decorators.standard_representation.standard_representation.For example:
I like the idea of using some sort of "dot" syntax to refer to other relative objects.
It would be nice to have a way to output actual runnable code for the
reprat some point too. This would require a recursive constructor, or a "reference constructor" to enable you to make any sort of graph structure. For example, if you had a classFoowith two attributes,barandbazand both attributes where assigned to the same object, then you would want yourreprto tell you that they are the same object. Maybe the reference constructor could use a dictionary specification of the self-referencing structure?