Open e18r opened 4 years ago
@e18r What specifications are missing design wise?
None, @javieralaves. I just assigned you so you can determine in which sprint to include this.
I believe we can’t display rejected allocations based on current contract limitations.
We can’t display pending ones until forwarder API gets merged.
Cc @Quazia
Currently, when having allocations in different states in Dot Voting,![Screenshot from 2020-01-08 12-15-58](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16065447/72000684-d0f87c80-3211-11ea-9313-1ebd16e92607.png)
Only the ones that are enacted show up in Allocations History:![Screenshot from 2020-01-08 12-16-10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16065447/72000751-f7b6b300-3211-11ea-9f8e-51b09ec8133f.png)
Make every kind of allocation show up in Allocations History according to the design:![Screenshot from 2020-01-08 12-26-46](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16065447/72000853-2e8cc900-3212-11ea-846b-9b09c5d43678.png)
This also implies changing the current possible Allocations History entry statuses from![Screenshot from 2020-01-08 12-27-59](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16065447/72000916-567c2c80-3212-11ea-9f10-af6f436a3bed.png)
To Pending, Rejected and Enacted.
Also, you need to include a new icon for the Pending status.