Autodesk / revit-ifc

IFC for Revit and Navisworks (2019+)
486 stars 196 forks source link

PR: IFC exporter v22.6.x vs 22.5.0 Classification #660

Open xpt5 opened 1 year ago

xpt5 commented 1 year ago

Problem Description

... When upgrading to a newer ifc exporter version (v22.6.2.0) I noticed that the Classification data output was not the same as an earlier exporter version (v22.5.0.0). A similar discussion already exists #556 but it refers to Revit 2023.1.1 so I created a new thread.

What I am expecting from the exporter is explained by the following picture (both 22.6.0.0 as 22.6.2.0 output the same data) ZOOM_v22 6 0_edit

I tried different IFC viewers such as Solibri and ZOOM and the result is the same. The Revit Assembly Code description is not exported to the Classification tab (in Solibri) nor to Summary tab (ZOOM). Is this the expected behavior? If it is, could you please explain why is that?

The output from the different IFC files:

`FILE_NAME('projectnummer','2023-07-12T10:45:25',(''),(''),'ODA IFC SDK 22.8','22.1.40.58 - Exporter 22.6.2.0 - Alternate UI 22.6.2.0','');

10268=IFCCLASSIFICATIONREFERENCE('https://www.csiresources.org/standards/uniformat','22.21','Uniformat',#93);

FILE_NAME('projectnummer','2023-07-07T15:08:28',(''),(''),'ODA IFC SDK 22.8','22.1.40.58 - Exporter 22.6.0.0 - Alternate UI 22.6.0.0','');

8845=IFCCLASSIFICATIONREFERENCE('https://www.csiresources.org/standards/uniformat','22.21','Uniformat',#93);

FILE_NAME('projectnummer','2023-07-12T09:28:13',(''),(''),'ODA IFC SDK 22.8','22.1.40.58 - Exporter 22.5.0.0 - Alternate UI 22.5.0.0','');

10513=IFCCLASSIFICATIONREFERENCE('https://www.csiresources.org/standards/uniformat','22.21','binnenwanden; constructief, massieve wanden',#9665);`

Thank you in advance.

Revit Version

2022.1.x

IFC for Revit Addon Version

22.6.2

Windows Version

10 22H2

AngelVelezSosa commented 1 year ago

We haven't updated Revit 2022 yet as we are working on fixing some 2023/2024 regressions first.

t-vasyi commented 8 months ago

The fix for the issues reported in this thread will be included in the next IFC Exporter releases. Please, let me know if you still have any classification issues Thanks

image image

xpt5 commented 8 months ago

@t-vasyi thank you for the heads up. I still have nevertheless issues with the classification with the last IFC release.

FILE_DESCRIPTION(('ViewDefinition [CoordinationView_V2.0, QuantityTakeOffAddOnView]','RevitIdentifiers [VersionGUID: 5000065c-850f-4517-985b-1d816116d4b3, NumberOfSaves: 1]','CoordinateReference [CoordinateBase: Internal Origin, ProjectSite: Default Site]'),'2;1'); FILE_NAME('Project1.ifczip','2024-03-22T13:27:03',(''),(''),'ODA IFC SDK 22.8','22.1.40.58 - IFC 22.7.0.0 - Default UI',''); FILE_SCHEMA(('IFC2X3'));

Line 178: #170=IFCCLASSIFICATIONREFERENCE('https://www.bimloket.nl/p/715/Tabellen','22.11',$,#168);

BIMcollab_Zoom_sykHIN4Ybu Solibri_c3q2Ff672G

t-vasyi commented 8 months ago

Unfortunately, the issue was fix after the 22.7 release