Open tripflex opened 4 years ago
This came up in https://wordpress.org/support/topic/gallery-problem-24/
@richardmtl this is based on the topic in the suppprt forum and my discussion with @tripflex during a support issue and what he found out
has it been resolved yet? having issues with listings not showing the scaled images
WordPress rotating images also fails with job manager
eg DSC_0552-rotated.jpg
This is also not working:(
ping @jom @fjorgemota @gkaragia or whoever is still apart of this project? Seeing this issue starting to happen more and more frequently
ping @jom @fjorgemota @gkaragia or whoever is still apart of this project? Seeing this issue starting to happen more and more frequently
Coincidentally I checked back on this issue yesterday to see if it was only me having the problem, clearly not!
@onubrooks June is almost over ...
Hey @tripflex this is a label that we use to track our current and future work, not about what will be fixed in June.
4 years later and this is still an issue guys .....
@mikeyarce @yscik @fjorgemota @gkaragia
Hi there @tripflex,
In 4 years, quite a lot of things happened in WPJM, and I understand it can be frustrating seeing things moving forward and having your own request still not being updated.
We're trying to sort out priorities by project, emergency, and number of requests, and we're a small team, which means we sometimes have to prioritize things differently than you'd expect them to be prioritized.
There's also no need to ping anyone if you don't have a specific question in mind, we regularly skim through the backlog to reprioritize existing issues; as long as your issue is here, we know it's here.
All that said, WP Job Manager is also an open source project, if you feel things are not going the way you'd like them to go, you still have the power to submit a PR, we'll be happy to review it and see how it'd fit in the core.
Could you guys please prioritize this for the next update?
https://make.wordpress.org/core/2019/10/09/introducing-handling-of-big-images-in-wordpress-5-3/
Introduced in WordPress 5.3, if an image is above a certain "threshold" (width or height), with a default of
2560
, WordPress will automatically created a "scaled" version of the image, signified by-scaled
being added to the image name, resulting in an image like:XXX-scaled.jpg
The issue with this is that the value saved for fields on listings, is the actual full res URL of the image, not the "scaled" version of the image. Technically these images still exist (as WordPress just creates an additional "scaled" version of the image), but there's two reasons I wanted to bring this up.
Unable to convert URL to attachment ID The first issue is that any plugin or theme that attempts to convert the URL to an "attachment post ID" will fail, including calling the internal WordPress core
attachment_url_to_postid
function, since the value saved to listings is the not the "scaled" version, and when the attachment is inserted, the data is replaced with the URL to the "scaled" image (see below).Full Res Images are Served on Sites The other issue is that technically this feature of using "scaled" images will be disregarded by WPJM and the full res images will be served. By supporting the "scaling" feature of WordPress 5.3+, we can make sure that when the user has not specifically disabled the "scaling" feature, that the scaled images will be used -- speeding up site load times, as well as the issue mentioned above.
This only happens when the image is "attached" to a listing, and is triggered by the following:
It appears that this metadata is passed back to the
wp_generate_attachment_metadata
function called by WPJM, which includes the metadata saved to the "attachment post" includingoriginal_image
So IMO I think to resolve these issues, we should work on adding support for handling this "scaling" of images.
Specifically in the
wp-content/plugins/wp-job-manager/includes/forms/class-wp-job-manager-form-submit-job.php
file where we callwp_generate_attachment_metadata
we can check the data returned to see if the image was in fact "scaled", we would just have to figure out how we would then update the data in$values
to reflect this.The problem is that
create_attachment
is called after the metadata is updated/set inupdate_job_data
, so we would essentially have to move things around a bit, or come up with the best way to handle this.What are your thoughts @jom ?