Open jeherve opened 7 years ago
Looking forward to get support for this TIA
This issue has been marked as stale. This happened because:
No further action is needed. But it's worth checking if this ticket has clear reproduction steps and it is still reproducible. Feel free to close this issue if you think it's not valid anymore — if you do, please add a brief explanation.
This issue has been marked as stale. This happened because:
No further action is needed. But it's worth checking if this ticket has clear reproduction steps and it is still reproducible. Feel free to close this issue if you think it's not valid anymore — if you do, please add a brief explanation.
This isssue is valid and needs to be addressed. All my client sites are getting errors from Search Console because of this issue and it needs to be addressed.
Google Stuctured Data Testing Tool is reporting that the Contact Info widget had two errors. The first is a value for an image field and the second is a value for a name field. However, the Jetpack widget does not have either a name or image setting, so I'm not sure how to fix this.
It's also reporting price range on the same line, which is odd.
Here is the URL of the page being tested:
https://savethegreatsouthbay.org/event/sayville-creek-defender-clean-up/
Here's a screenshot:
What should I do here?
@tonyzeoli There isn't much you can do here to immediately fix this on your site. In its Structured Data testing tool, Google chooses to require specific fields, and recommend others. They currently require 2 fields that do not exist in Jetpack's Contact Info widget (name and image), and recommend another (priceRange).
The Contact Info widget would consequently need to be expanded to include those new fields in the widget settings. Based on those fields, we can add the necessary Schema markup on the frontend, that would solve those errors in Google's testing tool.
The widget currently lives here: https://github.com/Automattic/jetpack/blob/6aefc26364af0aaa9b950bdc64ba5020619eb8a2/modules/widgets/contact-info.php
@jeherve Okay, so my best course of action then is...to just wait. Is that correct?
@tonyzeoli That's correct, unless you feel comfortable contributing a patch to Jetpack before we get to it. We'll happily review any contribution!
Another report: hc-18492861
This issue has been marked as stale. This happened because:
No further action is needed. But it's worth checking if this ticket has clear reproduction steps and it is still reproducible. Feel free to close this issue if you think it's not valid anymore — if you do, please add a brief explanation.
Another report: 3508970-zen
Reported in #26343339-hc
Related PR: #7850
Steps to reproduce the issue
You will receive the following warnings:
To solve this issue, we would need to:
name
attribute, maybe using a new widget field named "business name"image
attribute by adding a new field allowing one to add a business logo to the widget.Reported in 892360-hc