Closed benlk closed 5 years ago
@benlk is there a reason you're choosing "Pym.js embeds" instead of "Pym embeds" (sans the .js)?
I don't have a considered reason for choosing "Pym.js Embeds" over "Pym Embeds". Do you think "Pym Embeds" would be better?
Further thoughts:
Pym Embeds:
Pym.js
" referring to the library.Pym.js Embeds
@alykat Does NPR have guidelines for Pym.js branding? The docs at http://blog.apps.npr.org/pym.js/ seem to use "Pym" and "Pym.js
" and "pym.js
" fairly interchangeably, notably calling users of the library "Pym users" in the 1.3.2 release note.
No formal guidelines on our end. We tend to use "Pym" as internal shorthand, but "pym.js" (capitalized or lowercase) is more precise, especially when addressing a broader audience that may not already know what it is.
Search results for "pym wordpress" and "pym.js wordpress" both have this plugin listed in the top 5 on DuckDuckGo and Google, so I'm not too concerned about SEO.
I agree with Aly's point that "Pym.js" is the more-precise name.
This name is chosen becuse it lacks the clunkiness of "shortcode and block".
In an email from Alyson Hurt, NPR Visuals Team member:
And that's good enough for me.
Resolves https://github.com/INN/pym-shortcode/issues/39