Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
GitHub is better for dealing with patches, but the main page of a project is
worse. Who wants to look at code before they know what a project even is? I
also prefer Google's wiki and issues.
Git as a tool is ok, but archaic and hard to use when things go south. I would
not use Git for a personal project where I am not collaborating. I agree it is
good for open source, as merging is much better than SVN. Still, as your recent
contributions have shown, users can use GitHub to contribute patches to Kryo.
I'm ok with how that works. I'm not sure the level of effort required to setup
a mirror.
Original comment by nathan.s...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2012 at 2:07
I see your points. Interesting!
Regarding the difficulty of mirroring:
I've found this service after I've seen your post: http://svn2github.com/
If they really provide the service in a way which is claimed on this page, then
mirroring and keeping github repo up-to-date is very easy ;-)
Original comment by romixlev
on 24 May 2012 at 4:18
I created the mirror at http://github.com/svn2github/kryo using this svn2github
service.
Original comment by romixlev
on 24 May 2012 at 5:17
Thanks, that is a neat service. Updated Kryo main page with GitHub mirror link.
Original comment by nathan.s...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2012 at 5:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
romixlev
on 24 May 2012 at 11:50