Closed Wally869 closed 8 months ago
CCIP-BnM contract seems to accept 0 value transferAndCall (see passing tests in b0695aa2ee157e382651c9d651298b3afc6181d1)
Will need to verify by calling the contract on testnet to be sure
Also what about crosschain calls?
CCIP-BnM contract seems to accept 0 value transferAndCall (see passing tests in b0695aa)
Will need to verify by calling the contract on testnet to be sure
I confirmed that 0-value transferAndCall are correctly working in a same-chain context https://testnet.snowtrace.io/tx/0xa21f3e71ed14e44aa4a164414768eec4f1a0c556f34fad56c20d769cc11beca9?chainId=43113
Docs also show that cross-chain messaging can be independent from sending a token. Difference is: I think it'll be calling CCIPReceive instead of onTokenTransfer?
So both functions should do same thing, need to check which function is called in which context tbh
Crosschain calls between testnets are a success: https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x0f247d9e6505516dfc7d6f7a49b680384cec6d385ebe6b8006dc378b9d64749e
Crosschain token transfers call the "_ccipReceive" function, while same chain transferAndCall call the "onTokensTransfer" method.
Parameters for send in crosschain are a bit troublesome, plus require fees estimate, maybe create a small sender contract to simplify the task. Closing for now, would be in another issue
Minting is done using a transferAndCall on the CCIP-BnM token which calls the Receiver which in turns calls the Summit contract to mint a token.
This flow is fine for a Reader User, but transferAndCall should require tokens to be transferred. The issue is for a Writer User creating a new article: this is a free action and transferAndCall may not be appropriate if no funds are sent
To Do