Closed IEvangelist closed 8 months ago
Thanks @IEvangelist
I just now saw #186, I didn't realize before that there was an effort in place to do this work. There are parts of that PR that look good—@luisquintanilla how should we proceed?
I pulled in the changes from the PR that I liked. ~Let's add the CPM in a separate PR, since versions weren't bumped~.
I've bumped the versions, and I'm updating this PR to utilize the CPM feature since it does improve the
PacakgeReference
experience.
Sounds good @IEvangelist. Thanks.
Which parts from #186 are not in this PR?
Just be aware that #186 builds on top of #184 so there are some unrelated changes are the VS Code experience in the PR.
I noticed that this PR also upgrades to C# 12 preview - I'd suggest not doing that in this PR but in a follow-up one to ensure that it's easier to review the .NET 8 specific changes without also having language changes in there.
Small and targeted PRs are easier to review and remediate.
@LittleLittleCloud do these changes affect the App Insight / Authentication changes you've made?
@luisquintanilla Shouldn't be effected.
Cool. Let's merge those in first then and do a quick test and follow of these changes.
Shall we close #186 in favour of this?
Yesterday I noticed a problem in my PR with VS Code debugging which I addressed in https://github.com/Azure-Samples/azure-search-openai-demo-csharp/pull/186/commits/178aa843c4f8149e779387ff3f3931aa8c2eb492 (although there's another problem that I'm digging through)
Shall we close #186 in favour of this?
Yesterday I noticed a problem in my PR with VS Code debugging which I addressed in 178aa84 (although there's another problem that I'm digging through)
I'm okay with that. Should #184 be closed as well since #186 built on top of it?
Shall we close #186 in favour of this? Yesterday I noticed a problem in my PR with VS Code debugging which I addressed in 178aa84 (although there's another problem that I'm digging through)
I'm okay with that. Should #184 be closed as well since #186 built on top of it?
I'd merge #184 first as the changes it introduces are unrelated to the .NET 8 upgrade, so it would give better history tracking of when/why changes were made.
I just now saw #186, I didn't realize before that there was an effort in place to do this work. There are parts of that PR that look good—@luisquintanilla how should we proceed?
I pulled in the changes from the PR that I liked. ~Let's add the CPM in a separate PR, since versions weren't bumped~.
I've bumped the versions, and I'm updating this PR to utilize the CPM feature since it does improve the
PacakgeReference
experience.