Wrong architecture for image mcr.microsoft.com/iotedge/opc-plc:2.4.0-linux-arm64v8

[sylvaneau]

Please provide us with the following information:

This issue is for a: (mark with an x)

- [x] bug report -> please search issues before submitting
- [ ] feature request
- [ ] documentation issue or request
- [ ] regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped in a new release)

Minimal steps to reproduce

A mac with Silicon processor (M1, M2) docker run -it --rm mcr.microsoft.com/iotedge/opc-plc:2.4.0-linux-arm64v8 or docker run -it --rm mcr.microsoft.com/iotedge/opc-plc:2.4.0

Any log messages given by the failure

WARNING: The requested image's platform (linux/arm/v7) does not match the detected host platform (linux/arm64/v8) and no specific platform was requested exec ./opcplc: no such file or directory

Expected/desired behavior

A working opc-plc container :-)

OS and Version?

macOS (Monterey) with M1 processor (arm64/v8 architecture)

Versions

opc-plc 2.4.0

Mention any other details that might be useful

if you perform a docker inspect on the image you will find that it has been built with the linux/arm/v7 (32 bits) architecture even the image pointed by the 2.4.0-linux-arm64v8 tag. It seems it is an error in the deployment pipeline because I've managed to simply build the image myself from a Windows PC using the following command (from your documentation) and it works :

.\tools\scripts\docker-source.ps1 .\src
docker build -f .\src\bin\publish\Release\linux-arm64\Dockerfile.linux-arm64v8 -t iotedge/opc-plc .\src\bin\publish\Release\linux-x64

It would be amazing if you can fix it ! :-)

---

Thanks! We'll be in touch soon.

[luiscantero]

@sylvaneau this is now fixed. Thanks for reporting it.

[sylvaneau]

And thanks for fixing it so quickly! ;-)