- [x] bug report -> please search issues before submitting
- [ ] feature request
- [ ] documentation issue or request
- [ ] regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped in a new release)
Minimal steps to reproduce
A mac with Silicon processor (M1, M2)
docker run -it --rm mcr.microsoft.com/iotedge/opc-plc:2.4.0-linux-arm64v8
or docker run -it --rm mcr.microsoft.com/iotedge/opc-plc:2.4.0
Any log messages given by the failure
WARNING: The requested image's platform (linux/arm/v7) does not match the detected host platform (linux/arm64/v8) and no specific platform was requested
exec ./opcplc: no such file or directory
Expected/desired behavior
A working opc-plc container :-)
OS and Version?
macOS (Monterey) with M1 processor (arm64/v8 architecture)
Versions
opc-plc 2.4.0
Mention any other details that might be useful
if you perform a docker inspect on the image you will find that it has been built with the linux/arm/v7 (32 bits) architecture even the image pointed by the 2.4.0-linux-arm64v8 tag.
It seems it is an error in the deployment pipeline because I've managed to simply build the image myself from a Windows PC using the following command (from your documentation) and it works :
This issue is for a: (mark with an
x
)Minimal steps to reproduce
Any log messages given by the failure
Expected/desired behavior
OS and Version?
Versions
Mention any other details that might be useful
if you perform a
docker inspect
on the image you will find that it has been built with the linux/arm/v7 (32 bits) architecture even the image pointed by the 2.4.0-linux-arm64v8 tag. It seems it is an error in the deployment pipeline because I've managed to simply build the image myself from a Windows PC using the following command (from your documentation) and it works :It would be amazing if you can fix it ! :-)