Azure / Azure-Verified-Modules

Azure Verified Modules (AVM) is an initiative to consolidate and set the standards for what a good Infrastructure-as-Code module looks like. Modules will then align to these standards, across languages (Bicep, Terraform etc.) and will then be classified as AVMs and available from their respective language specific registries.
https://aka.ms/AVM
MIT License
320 stars 67 forks source link

[Module Proposal]: `avm/res/aad/domain-service` #422

Closed AoifeMc-G closed 5 months ago

AoifeMc-G commented 9 months ago

Check for previous/existing GitHub issues/module proposals

Check this module doesn't already exist in the module indexes

Bicep or Terraform?

Bicep

Module Classification?

Resource Module

Module Name

avm/res/aad/domain-service

Module Details

Migrate from CARML

Do you want to be the owner of this module?

No

Module Owner's GitHub Username (handle)

CRYP70N1X

(Optional) Secondary Module Owner's GitHub Username (handle)

ReneHezser (Primary Owner) AoifeMc-G (Owner) jamiepla1 (Owner) (Jamie Pla)

matebarabas commented 8 months ago

Hi @AoifeMc-G,

Thanks for requesting/proposing to be an AVM module owner!

We just want to confirm you agree to the below pages that define what module ownership means:

Any questions or clarifications needed, let us know!

If you agree, please just reply to this issue with the exact sentence below (as this helps with our automation πŸ‘):

"I CONFIRM I WISH TO OWN THIS AVM MODULE AND UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITION OF A MODULE OWNER"

Thanks,

The AVM Core Team

RR

matebarabas commented 8 months ago

@AiofeMc-G please respond to this issue at your earliest convenience by repeating the above quoted text ("I CONFIRM..."). Thank you!

CC: @ChrisSidebotham

AoifeMc-G commented 8 months ago

"I CONFIRM I WISH TO OWN THIS AVM MODULE AND UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITION OF A MODULE OWNER"

Aoife McGuegan

Aoife McGurgan

she/her Technology Consultant Mobile: +44 7803340088 @.**@.>

[signatureImage]


matebarabas commented 8 months ago

Hi @AoifeMc-G,

Thanks for confirming that you wish to own this AVM module and understand the related requirements and responsibilities!

Before starting development, please ensure ALL the following requirements are met.

Please use the following values explicitly as provided in the module index page:

Check if this module exists in the other IaC language. If so, collaborate with the other owner for consistency. πŸ‘

You can now start the development of this module! βœ… Happy coding! πŸŽ‰

Please respond to this comment and request a review from the AVM core team once your module is ready to be published! Please include a link pointing to your PR, once available. πŸ™

Any further questions or clarifications needed, let us know!

Thanks,

The AVM Core Team

matebarabas commented 7 months ago

This module is now looking for a new owner! If you're interested in picking it up, please leave a comment! πŸ‘

CRYP70N1X commented 6 months ago

Hi @matebarabas, I'm working with a couple of folks on possibly taking ownership and working on this module. I'd like to bring this up for discussion with the AVM core team next Tuesday on regular meeting. Please keep me open for this request. Thanks

CRYP70N1X commented 6 months ago

Hi @matebarabas, Please assign this module to the following owner. @ReneHezser (Primary Owner) @CRYP70N1X (Primary Owner) @AoifeMc-G (Owner) @jamiepla1 (Owner) (Jamie Pla) Thanks,

matebarabas commented 6 months ago

@CRYP70N1X, thank you for recruiting a team to help develop and maintain this module. πŸ‘

Note that while in the module index, we can only track one primary and one secondary owner, I've put down all the names listed above on this issue's description. Please let me know if you're happy with being the primary owner (or if I should administer RenΓ©), and please let me know who I should capture as the secondary owner. We then will do a quick "handshake" with the primary owner, where we make things "official". Thanks!

matebarabas commented 6 months ago

Hi @CRYP70N1X,

Thanks for requesting/proposing to be an AVM module owner!

We just want to confirm you agree to the below pages that define what module ownership means:

Any questions or clarifications needed, let us know!

If you agree, please just reply to this issue with the exact sentence below (as this helps with our automation πŸ‘):

"I CONFIRM I WISH TO OWN THIS AVM MODULE AND UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITION OF A MODULE OWNER"

Thanks,

The AVM Core Team

RR

CRYP70N1X commented 6 months ago

"I CONFIRM I WISH TO OWN THIS AVM MODULE AND UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITION OF A MODULE OWNER"

matebarabas commented 6 months ago

Hi @CRYP70N1X,

Thanks for confirming that you wish to own this AVM module and understand the related requirements and responsibilities!

Before starting development, please ensure ALL the following requirements are met.

Please use the following values explicitly as provided in the module index page:

Check if this module exists in the other IaC language. If so, collaborate with the other owner for consistency. πŸ‘

You can now start the development of this module! βœ… Happy coding! πŸŽ‰

Please respond to this comment and request a review from the AVM core team once your module is ready to be published! Please include a link pointing to your PR, once available. πŸ™

Any further questions or clarifications needed, let us know!

Thanks,

The AVM Core Team

ReneHezser commented 6 months ago

I think the name for this module should be aad-domainservices (note the trailing s) to follow Microsoft.AAD/DomainServices.

Do we need to rename groups to match this as well?

matebarabas commented 6 months ago

@ReneHezser, this naming is correct as it follows the AVM naming convention for resource modules (RMNFR1).

Note that resource type is intentionally in a singular form as the AVM resource modules always deploy a single instance of the resource/service in question. Also, there's a hyphen between the word of domain and services, as there's camel casing in the original resource type's name.

The two GH teams you need to create (one for owners, one for contributors) follow a slightly different naming convention, described here: SNFR20, but the easiest and best way of making sure you don't make a mistake when you create them is to grab there name from the related module index CSV, which in your case is this one here: Bicep Resource Modules

ReneHezser commented 6 months ago

Thanks @matebarabas I missed that one. Let's keep it as it was then.

ReneHezser commented 5 months ago

Don't worry bot. There are a lot of activities. Just not in the main branch of this repo :-)

matebarabas commented 5 months ago

Don't worry bot. There are a lot of activities. Just not in the main branch of this repo :-)

Please don't forget to provide a link to the PR, once there's one available! πŸ˜‰ Thanks!

ReneHezser commented 5 months ago

Here we go feat: aad/domain-service πŸŽ‰

ReneHezser commented 5 months ago

Hey bot. Just wanted to inform you that the PR has been merged.

matebarabas commented 5 months ago

Thank you for your work @ReneHezser! I'm closing this issue now.

ReneHezser commented 3 months ago

Hi @matebarabas, I discussed with @CRYP70N1X to rotate the primary and secondary ownership of this module. Can you please swap the order of our names?

I confirm I wish to own this AVM module and understand the requirements and definition of a module owner.

CRYP70N1X commented 3 months ago

[like] Paul Chirila reacted to your message:


matebarabas commented 3 months ago

@ReneHezser, @CRYP70N1X, no problem at all. I'll update the public records with the next index update.