The Azure Landing Zones (Enterprise-Scale) architecture provides prescriptive guidance coupled with Azure best practices, and it follows design principles across the critical design areas for organizations to define their Azure architecture
Hi, I'm running into some issues deploying initiatives from eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions/policies.json and eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions/initiatives.json. Specifically, when I deploy the initiatives, I get messages like:
PolicyDefinitionNotFound
The policy set definition 'Enforce-Guardrails-BotService' request is invalid. The following policy definition could not be found: '/providers/Microsoft.Authorization/policyDefinitions/ad5621d6-a877-4407-aa93-a950b428315e'.
The full list of failures is:
Set / Policy not found
Enforce-EncryptTransit / 0e80e269-43a4-4ae9-b5bc-178126b8a5cb
Enforce-EncryptTransit_20240509 / 0e80e269-43a4-4ae9-b5bc-178126b8a5cb
Enforce-Guardrails-Automation / 6d02d2f7-e38b-4bdc-96f3-adc0a8726abc
Enforce-Guardrails-BotService / ad5621d6-a877-4407-aa93-a950b428315e
Enforce-Guardrails-ContainerApps / 8b346db6-85af-419b-8557-92cee2c0f9bb
Enforce-Guardrails-KeyVault / 86810a98-8e91-4a44-8386-ec66d0de5d57
Enforce-Guardrails-KeyVault-Sup / 84d327c3-164a-4685-b453-900478614456
Enforce-Guardrails-MachineLearning / e413671a-dd10-4cc1-a943-45b598596cb7
Enforce-Guardrails-MySQL / 3a58212a-c829-4f13-9872-6371df2fd0b4
Enforce-Guardrails-Network / 6484db87-a62d-4327-9f07-80a2cbdf333a
Enforce-Guardrails-Storage / 361c2074-3595-4e5d-8cab-4f21dffc835c
I should note this is in usgovvirginia.
I figured maybe there was a change upstream that hadn't been applied to this repo, so I tried rebuilding them:
az bicep build \
--file ./src/templates/policies.bicep \
--outfile ./eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions/policies.json
az bicep build \
--file ./src/templates/initiatives.bicep \
--outfile ./eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions/initiatives.json
az bicep build \
--file ./src/templates/roles.bicep \
--outfile ./eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/roleDefinitions/customRoleDefinitions.json
After that, the only failure is Enforce-Guardrails-MachineLearning / e413671a-dd10-4cc1-a943-45b598596cb7 (policy defninition not found), but it does still fail.
So, finally getting around to my actual question, should the templates in eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions match the output of az bicep build? I note that the ARM templates have dire warnings about being programmatically generated, but looking at the commit history that isn't always the case.
Hi, I'm running into some issues deploying initiatives from eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions/policies.json and eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions/initiatives.json. Specifically, when I deploy the initiatives, I get messages like: PolicyDefinitionNotFound The policy set definition 'Enforce-Guardrails-BotService' request is invalid. The following policy definition could not be found: '/providers/Microsoft.Authorization/policyDefinitions/ad5621d6-a877-4407-aa93-a950b428315e'.
The full list of failures is: Set / Policy not found Enforce-EncryptTransit / 0e80e269-43a4-4ae9-b5bc-178126b8a5cb Enforce-EncryptTransit_20240509 / 0e80e269-43a4-4ae9-b5bc-178126b8a5cb Enforce-Guardrails-Automation / 6d02d2f7-e38b-4bdc-96f3-adc0a8726abc Enforce-Guardrails-BotService / ad5621d6-a877-4407-aa93-a950b428315e Enforce-Guardrails-ContainerApps / 8b346db6-85af-419b-8557-92cee2c0f9bb Enforce-Guardrails-KeyVault / 86810a98-8e91-4a44-8386-ec66d0de5d57 Enforce-Guardrails-KeyVault-Sup / 84d327c3-164a-4685-b453-900478614456 Enforce-Guardrails-MachineLearning / e413671a-dd10-4cc1-a943-45b598596cb7 Enforce-Guardrails-MySQL / 3a58212a-c829-4f13-9872-6371df2fd0b4 Enforce-Guardrails-Network / 6484db87-a62d-4327-9f07-80a2cbdf333a Enforce-Guardrails-Storage / 361c2074-3595-4e5d-8cab-4f21dffc835c
I should note this is in usgovvirginia.
I figured maybe there was a change upstream that hadn't been applied to this repo, so I tried rebuilding them:
After that, the only failure is Enforce-Guardrails-MachineLearning / e413671a-dd10-4cc1-a943-45b598596cb7 (policy defninition not found), but it does still fail.
So, finally getting around to my actual question, should the templates in eslzArm/managementGroupTemplates/policyDefinitions match the output of az bicep build? I note that the ARM templates have dire warnings about being programmatically generated, but looking at the commit history that isn't always the case.