Closed danycontre closed 6 months ago
Just a quick observation, for the CARML modules, unless you've done other editing in the modules to make them custom, I'd say revert those specific changes and let this be an "upstream" problem that is presumably fixed with a future release of their modules. Just adjust your own code, not their modules. Future of CARML is weird anyhow with AVM coming up -- but that's a whole other topic :)
Agree, we will be updating CARML modules to AVM soon, but to your point, yes, we made local edits to the CARML modules, so they work in our use case.
Updated code merged.
cc: @moisesjgomez @ckittel @swathibhat1
Overview/Summary
Replace this with a brief description of what this Pull Request fixes, changes, etc.
This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes
Breaking Changes
Testing Evidence
Replace this with any testing evidence to show that your Pull Request works/fixes as described and planned (include screenshots, if appropriate).
As part of this Pull Request I have
.bicep
file/s I am adding/editing are using the latest API version possiblemain
branch