I found this experience to be a little odd/unexpected:
# this was a little strange, name is ambiguous
# I would expect --name to be the name of the connection (or that <name> would be an arg, not a flag) as --connection implies a different thing (rather than "this" thing to show). --name seems like it ought be "this" thing to show, which would be implied context. If it was --cluster-name, then it would be a clear different context
az aks connection show --connection <name> --resource-group <rg-name> --name <i-think-this-is-aks-cluster-name-which-is-awkward>
I would find this more clear:
# for clarity, this would clarify ux:
az aks connection show <connection-name> --resource-group <rg-name> --cluster <aks-cluster-name>
# or alternatively
az aks connection show --name <connection-name> --resource-group <rg-name> --cluster <aks-cluster-name>
Related command
az aks connection
Errors
No error, this is a UX related bug.
Issue script & Debug output
No script needed.
Expected behavior
Clarification of resources given flags provided.
Environment Summary
az version
{
"azure-cli": "2.65.0",
"azure-cli-core": "2.65.0",
"azure-cli-telemetry": "1.1.0",
"extensions": {
"interactive": "1.0.0b1",
"scenario-guide": "0.1.1"
}
}
Describe the bug
I found this experience to be a little odd/unexpected:
I would find this more clear:
Related command
az aks connection
Errors
No error, this is a UX related bug.
Issue script & Debug output
No script needed.
Expected behavior
Clarification of resources given flags provided.
Environment Summary
az version { "azure-cli": "2.65.0", "azure-cli-core": "2.65.0", "azure-cli-telemetry": "1.1.0", "extensions": { "interactive": "1.0.0b1", "scenario-guide": "0.1.1" } }
Additional context
No response