Closed YunchuWang closed 2 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 93.11%. Comparing base (
31f3d42
) to head (ef5323b
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 93.11%. Comparing base (
b85eb7a
) to head (ef5323b
). Report is 5 commits behind head on dev.:exclamation: Current head ef5323b differs from pull request most recent head 2a26758. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2a26758 to get more accurate results
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Fixes #197
Context and Problem: Issue #197 highlighted a discrepancy in the Azure Functions documentation and the actual behavior of the BlobTrigger binding. According to the documentation, the BlobTrigger binding supports a source argument that allows setting the source of the triggering event to EventGrid for lower latency. However, in practice, the BlobTrigger binding does not currently accept this argument, and the default method for detecting changes in a blob container is through the standard polling mechanism (LogsAndContainerScan).
Objective: This Pull Request aims to align the functionality of the BlobTrigger with the documented features by introducing the EventGrid source option. This will enable users to leverage Event Grid-based triggers for blob storage, providing a more efficient and lower-latency mechanism for blob event handling.