Python 3.6 baggage code removal

hallvictoria commented 5 months ago

Description

Fixes # https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-pyfx-planning/issues/139 // https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-pyfx-planning/issues/176

PR information

[ ] The title of the PR is clear and informative.
[ ] There are a small number of commits, each of which has an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
[ ] If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes in the description.
[ ] New Unit tests were added for the changes made and CI is passing.

Quality of Code and Contribution Guidelines

[ ] I have read the contribution guidelines.

codecov[bot] commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5f352af) 85.46% compared to head (ae10d6e) 85.45%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
azure_functions_worker/main.py	0.00%	2 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## dev #1419 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 85.46% 85.45% -0.02% ========================================== Files 35 35 Lines 1968 1966 -2 Branches 370 370 ========================================== - Hits 1682 1680 -2 Misses 213 213 Partials 73 73 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Azure/azure-functions-python-worker/pull/1419/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Azure) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Azure/azure-functions-python-worker/pull/1419/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Azure) | `85.40% <60.00%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Azure#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

vrdmr commented 5 months ago

We should be able to remove aio_compat.py as well as rethink if we need typing_inspect.py itself.

Azure / azure-functions-python-worker