Closed markweitzel closed 2 years ago
Status update on 7/27 I just had my review meeting with @Mark Weitzel and team. • API paths are not consistent across the service. • Polymorphic types do not follow pattern that needs to be followed. • Long running jobs such as InteractiveQuery do not return correct HTTP status. • Overall, there is a need for a full revisit of Scanning (and other Purview) services.
Next steps: I will reserve another slot with the stewardship team with all the stakeholders involved, once @Naga Krishna Yenamandra arrives, i.e, with @Shawn Xiao (IM)’ s team, @Philip Liu’s team, @Naga Krishna Yenamandra and myself.
@pvadali-az -- Please review the Azure REST API Style Guidelines. In those guidelines you find a helpful utility that we've been experimenting with, Spectral. Running this within VS Code will help you identify many of the correctness issues that should be addressed, e.g.
[Purview - API Scanning] API Review
PR #19797 Planning on reservice this time slot. I will send a meeting invite to azureapirbcore and azure-restapi-int if you don’t see any issues with the time slots. Other information regarding the PR/Service
API REVIEWS