Open mkosieradzki opened 4 years ago
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!
I also consider this quite important to use the operator in a somewhat secure manner. Even with #1173 I might want to have gatekeeper rules just to uncover configuration mistakes.
Issue still active.
This is still something we're tracking to do
We're still interested in doing this
We're still interested in this.
We still are interested in doing this
Still interested in doing this. We would also be willing to accept contributions from the community if they have sample policies that they're already using in production.
No change from the above.
It would be great for multi-tenant clusters to have example (and supported) gatekeeper policies that enable namespace-based ownership of the resources, e.g. you can only access resources from Resource Groups with names dervived from your namespace using some conventions.
This is an alternative approach to: #1173