Closed dijitali closed 3 months ago
Distribution via package managers is something that I believe we're planning on doing at a future date. When, we're not entirely certain about, however.
@adreed-msft For our usecase, a pure http download, as today is fine. However, it would be great if the executable itself could be immediately available (not inside a zip file), to avoid this brittle piece of code:
curl --silent --location https://aka.ms/downloadazcopy-v10-linux
| sudo tar xvz --wildcards --file - --strip-components 1 --directory /usr/local/bin "*/azcopy"
(It's one long line of code, broken into two for readability).
To me, this would be happiness:
curl --silent --location https://aka.ms/downloadazcopy-v10-linux-bin --output /usr/local/bin/azcopy
@adreed-msft Any chance of this being revisited soon? Seems strange that the azcli
is available as a proper package but azcopy
is not.
We now support distribution through package manager for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Ubuntu, Mariner, Debian, SUSE, Rocky and CentOS.
Which version of the AzCopy was used?
Note: The version is visible when running AzCopy without any argument
AzCopy 10.3.4
Which platform are you using? (ex: Windows, Mac, Linux)
Mac & Linux
What command did you run?
Note: Please remove the SAS to avoid exposing your credentials. If you cannot remember the exact command, please retrieve it from the beginning of the log file.
N/A
What problem was encountered?
No standardised way to install this other than download URLs on this repo.
Most major Microsoft projects seem to have a regular release process via a package manager that lets me:
How can we reproduce the problem in the simplest way?
N/A
Have you found a mitigation/solution?
Other Microsoft mature projects like this offer regular packaged, signed releases, for example the Azure CLI, Powershell: