search

Azure / azure-storage-ios

Client library for accessing Azure Storage on an iOS device
MIT License
82 stars 64 forks source link

Table Storage very much wanted! #16

Open larsoleruben opened 8 years ago

larsoleruben commented 8 years ago

I think table storage support would come in very handy

esummers-msft commented 8 years ago

Thank you for your feedback! Could you tell us more about how you would like to use Table storage in your application?

More details would be helpful in allowing us to prioritize features for future releases.

larsoleruben commented 8 years ago

Hi

My current use case are for production data from windturbines, which should be visible from the app. Anyhow, I figured out how to do it via the REST interface. But that is not so simple, so I guess a lot of people would give up on this.

An other use case is cheap storage for usage and being able to make statistic on the data.

On 08 Jan 2016, at 20:03, esummers-msft notifications@github.com wrote:

Thank you for your feedback! Could you tell us more about how you would like to use Table storage in your application?

More details would be helpful in allowing us to prioritize features for future releases.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Azure/azure-storage-ios/issues/16#issuecomment-170094038.

esummers-msft commented 8 years ago

While we currently don’t have a timeline to share for when it will be available, Table Storage is definitely something we plan to support.

nothingimportant55 commented 7 years ago

I can't believe this library is so far behind the Android one

abhijitajmera commented 7 years ago

+1 to this requirement along with support for queues.

dzfweb commented 7 years ago

+1

ghost commented 6 years ago

+1 This is a much-needed feature! Especially for developers that want to write two versions (e.g. an iOS version and an Android version) of an application using this library and the Android one - which already has Table Storage functionality.

apsarpasha commented 6 years ago

+1 to this requirement along with support for queues.