Open benchiverton opened 2 months ago
@benchiverton please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]
Options:
- (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
- (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"
Background
Within my cloud infrastructure, I have a shared container app environment. When creating a new environment, I create an instance-level resource group to deploy my container apps to. I do this so that I can logically group my resources and avoid creating multiple/destroying app environments (which takes a while!).
However, this action assumes that the container app environment + container app are in the same rg. This PR aims to add functionality to support scenarios where the container app environment + container app are in the same rg.
Proposed solution
Add a new parameter
containerAppEnvironmentResourceGroup
, which when set will look for / create the container app environment in the supplied rg. If it's not set, resource groups will be created in the same way.Questions / known issues