iotedgedev build not respecting buildOptions from modules.json

[anandchugh]

• iotedgedev Version: 3.3.1
• Python Version:3.6.9
• Pip Version: 21.31.1
• Development machine OS Version: Ubuntu 18.04
• IoT Edge device OS Version: NA

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Add buildOptions in modules.json

   {
   "$schema-version": "0.0.1",
   "description": "",
   "image": {
   "repository": "${ACR_ADDRESS}/imagename",
   "tag": {
     "version": "0.0.7.preview",
     "platforms": {
       "arm64v8": "./Dockerfile.arm64v8",
       "arm64v8.debug": "./Dockerfile.arm64v8.debug"
     }
   },
   "buildOptions": [
     "--build-arg BASE_IMAGE=${BASE_IMAGE}",
     "--target final"
   ],
   "contextPath": "./"
   },
   "language": "python"
   }

2. Run following command iotedgedev build -f ./deployment.template.json -P arm64v8
3. Docker build is not using the buildOptions specified in modules.json
4. We also tried with VScode IotEdge extension(Azure IotEdge) and its working as expected.

[MrVhek]

I'm having the same problem trying to build an arm64v8 image on ubuntu using the command: iotedgedev build --file deployment.template.json --platform arm64v8 I keep having the message: [Warning] The requested image's platform (linux/arm64/v8) does not match the detected host platform (linux/amd64) and no specific platform was requested I've also tried adding "buildOptions": ["--platform linux/arm64/v8"] to my module.json but it doesn't change anything.

[konichi3]

Thank you for the report. We have added this to our backlog for further investigation

[mhshami01]

@anandchugh - In Iotedgedev, we use the docker client API to produce an image. The API is behaving differently than the docker cli build command, please see issue 2957. In VSCode, we use docker cli command, hence the difference in behavior.

[mhshami01]

@MrVhek - You are reporting an unrelated issue. Please feel free to file a separate report. Include information about the platform used, version of Ubuntu, etc.

[marianan]

Closing this issue due to inactivity.