The generated REC classes currently contain definitions such as the following:
"maxMultiplicity": {
"@type": "xsd:integer",
"@value": "1"
},
"minMultiplicity": {
"@type": "xsd:integer",
"@value": "0"
},
I believe this really should just read maxMultiplicity: 1 and minMultiplicity: 0
While this currently passes the DTDL validator, it is not officially valid DTDL syntax, to the best of my knowledge, and may fail in future versions of the DTDL parser .
The generated REC classes currently contain definitions such as the following: "maxMultiplicity": { "@type": "xsd:integer", "@value": "1" }, "minMultiplicity": { "@type": "xsd:integer", "@value": "0" },
I believe this really should just read maxMultiplicity: 1 and minMultiplicity: 0
While this currently passes the DTDL validator, it is not officially valid DTDL syntax, to the best of my knowledge, and may fail in future versions of the DTDL parser .