Closed michaeljguarino closed 3 months ago
Hello @michaeljguarino ,
the kubernetes_version
is ignored in the lifecycle:
https://github.com/Azure/terraform-azurerm-aks/blob/02bec58ba53544b5debf9f8942f7cc1ebf3170f7/main.tf#L543-L551
this is necessary to avoid Terraform state drift when using automatic_channel_upgrade
:
https://github.com/Azure/terraform-azurerm-aks/blob/02bec58ba53544b5debf9f8942f7cc1ebf3170f7/variables.tf#L346-L357
It is still necessary a mechanism to upgrade minor kubernetes versions, for example when using the patch
channel. For this reason the azapi_update_resource.aks_cluster_post_create
is triggered by a change in var.kubernetes_version
.
Please we are open for feedback, if you have a better proposal on how to handle AKS upgrade channels without causing Terraform configuration drift please share it with us.
Thanks
@michaeljguarino I forgot to mention explicitly that the lifecycle
ignore_changes
block cannot be made optional with a condition.
For this reason we can't make optional the calls to the resource azapi_update_resource. aks_cluster_post_create
.
Please let us know if you have additional questions or feedback, otherwise I will close this issue. Thanks
I'm closing this issue since no response from @michaeljguarino , please feel free to reopen it if you have any further questions.
Is there an existing issue for this?
Description
The Azure/azapi provider lags the mainline azurerm provider substantially, in particular in supporting workload identity auth. It's not clear that the azapi_update_resource calls are in fact necessary, if they aren't it'd be nice not to have a required dependency on a less well-maintained provider.
New or Affected Resource(s)/Data Source(s)
azapi_update_resource.aks_cluster_post_create
Potential Terraform Configuration
No response
References
No response