Open tbarkerwoolworths opened 3 weeks ago
Hi. I'm the author. On holiday at the moment. The rationale was when i started the azurerm provider was lacking significant functionality, that has since been addressed. I don't have any immediate plans to convert this to azurerm nor see any immediate need to do so, but open to more feedback on specific concerns.
hi @tbarkerwoolworths - just wondering if you can elaborate on the functionality gaps and bugs? You're correct in that a conversion to azurerm would be a breaking change, but azapi is fully supported.
@matt-FFFFFF i see container apps took the azurerm path - what's your thoughts here - should we convert the container apps managed environment resource to azurerm, noting the breaking change? i see some of the concerns i previously had with azapi being addressed with v2, but I also see merit in aligning with the container apps res module.
Just a after a bit of info as to the rational of using the azapi resource in order to provision the Azure Container App Environment over the Terraform AzureRM provider?
It appears the provider meets "most" of the use cases for the service albeit a little buggy. The concern here is that if we adopt the AVM module for the ACA environment, it would make it difficult to move to the native TF provider.
Just really after the rational around the decision. Thanks!