Azure / terraform-azurerm-avm-utl-regions

Re-publish of Azure/terraform-azurerm-regions made official as AVM
https://registry.terraform.io/modules/Azure/avm-utl-regions/azurerm
MIT License
0 stars 1 forks source link

AVM-Review #8

Open mbilalamjad opened 2 months ago

mbilalamjad commented 2 months ago

Dear module owner,

As per the module ownership requirements and responsibilities at the time of assignment, the AVM Team is opening this issue, requesting you to validate your module against the below AVM specifications and confirm its compliance.

Please don't close the AVM-Review issue until advised to do so. This review is a prerequisite for publishing a module as an AVM module in the Terraform Registry. The AVM team is happy to assist with any questions you might have.

Requested Actions

  1. Complete the below task list by ticking off the tasks.
  2. Complete the below table by updating the Compliant column with Yes, No or NA as possible values.

Please use the comments columns to provide additional details especially if the Compliant column is updated to No or NA.

### Tasks
- [x] Tick this as an acknowledgement of specs with comment "Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate" in the table below.
- [x] Ensure that the latest 'chore: repository governance' PR is merged into the main branch and your branch/fork is also updated with it.
- [x] Ensure that all checks on the latest 'chore: repository governance' PR are passing as the Compliant cell against the specs that are covered by these checks in table below is pre-populated with `Yes` based on that assumption.
ID Spec Compliant Comments
1 ID: SFR1 - Category: Composition - Preview Services NA if no preview services are used
2 ID: SFR2 - Category: Composition - WAF Aligned Ensure only high priority reliability & security recommendations are implemented if any
3 ID: SFR3 - Category: Telemetry - Deployment/Usage Telemetry
4 ID: SFR4 - Category: Telemetry - Telemetry Enablement Flexibility Yes Yes if AVM Template Repo has been used
5 ID: SFR5 - Category: Composition - Availability Zones
6 ID: SFR6 - Category: Composition - Data Redundancy
7 ID: SNFR25 - Category: Composition - Resource Naming
8 ID: SNFR1 - Category: Testing - Prescribed Tests Yes Yes if all e2e test, version-check & linting checks passed
9 ID: SNFR2 - Category: Testing - E2E Testing Yes Yes if e2e tests passed
10 ID: SNFR3 - Category: Testing - AVM Compliance Tests Yes Yes if all e2e test, version-check & linting checks passed
11 ID: SNFR4 - Category: Testing - Unit Tests NA if no tests created in tests folder
12 ID: SNFR5 - Category: Testing - Upgrade Tests NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
13 ID: SNFR6 - Category: Testing - Static Analysis/Linting Tests Yes Yes if all linting checks passed
14 ID: SNFR7 - Category: Testing - Idempotency Tests Yes Yes if e2e tests passed
15 ID: SNFR24 - Category: Testing - Testing Child, Extension & Interface Resources Yes Yes if e2e tests passed
16 ID: SNFR8 - Category: Contribution/Support - Module Owner(s) GitHub
17 ID: SNFR20 - Category: Contribution/Support - GitHub Teams Only
18 ID: SNFR9 - Category: Contribution/Support - AVM & PG Teams GitHub Repo Permissions
19 ID: SNFR10 - Category: Contribution/Support - MIT Licensing Yes Yes if AVM Template Repo has been used
20 ID: SNFR11 - Category: Contribution/Support - Issues Response Times NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
21 ID: SNFR12 - Category: Contribution/Support - Versions Supported NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
22 ID: SNFR23 - Category: Contribution/Support - GitHub Repo Labels
23 ID: SNFR14 - Category: Inputs - Data Types
24 ID: SNFR22 - Category: Inputs - Parameters/Variables for Resource IDs
25 ID: SNFR15 - Category: Documentation - Automatic Documentation Generation Yes Yes if linting / docs check passed
26 ID: SNFR16 - Category: Documentation - Examples/E2E Yes Yes if e2e tests passed
27 ID: SNFR17 - Category: Release - Semantic Versioning Yes Yes if version-check check passed
28 ID: SNFR18 - Category: Release - Breaking Changes NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
29 ID: SNFR19 - Category: Publishing - Registries Targeted NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
30 ID: SNFR21 - Category: Publishing - Cross Language Collaboration NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
31 ID: RMFR1 - Category: Composition - Single Resource Only
32 ID: RMFR2 - Category: Composition - No Resource Wrapper Modules
33 ID: RMFR3 - Category: Composition - Resource Groups
34 ID: RMFR4 - Category: Composition - AVM Consistent Feature & Extension Resources Value Add Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
35 ID: RMFR5 - Category: Composition - AVM Consistent Feature & Extension Resources Value Add Interfaces/Schemas Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
36 ID: RMFR8 - Category: Composition - Dependency on child and other resources
37 ID: RMFR6 - Category: Inputs - Parameter/Variable Naming
38 ID: RMFR7 - Category: Outputs - Minimum Required Outputs Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
39 ID: RMNFR1 - Category: Naming - Module Naming
40 ID: RMNFR2 - Category: Inputs - Parameter/Variable Naming
41 ID: RMNFR3 - Category: Composition - RP Collaboration NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
42 ID: PMFR1 - Category: Composition - Resource Group Creation NA if this is not a pattern module
43 ID: PMNFR1 - Category: Naming - Module Naming NA if this is not a pattern module
44 ID: PMNFR2 - Category: Composition - Use Resource Modules to Build a Pattern Module NA if this is not a pattern module
45 ID: PMNFR3 - Category: Composition - Use other Pattern Modules to Build a Pattern Module NA if this is not a pattern module
46 ID: PMNFR4 - Category: Hygiene - Missing Resource Module(s) NA if this is not a pattern module
47 ID: PMNFR5 - Category: Inputs - Parameter/Variable Naming NA if this is not a pattern module
48 ID: TFFR1 - Category: Composition - Cross-Referencing Modules
49 ID: TFFR2 - Category: Outputs - Additional Terraform Outputs Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
50 ID: TFNFR1 - Category: Documentation - Descriptions
51 ID: TFNFR2 - Category: Documentation - Module Documentation Generation Yes Yes if linting / docs check passed
52 ID: TFNFR3 - Category: Contribution/Support - GitHub Repo Branch Protection Yes Yes if AVM Template Repo has been used
53 ID: TFNFR4 - Category: Composition - Code Styling - lower snake_casing Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
54 ID: TFNFR5 - Category: Testing - Test Tooling Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
55 ID: TFNFR6 - Category: Code Style - Resource & Data Order
56 ID: TFNFR7 - Category: Code Style - count & for_each Use
57 ID: TFNFR8 - Category: Code Style - Resource & Data Block Orders Yes Yes if linting / avmfix check passed
58 ID: TFNFR9 - Category: Code Style - Module Block Order
59 ID: TFNFR10 - Category: Code Style - No Double Quotes in ignore_changes
60 ID: TFNFR11 - Category: Code Style - Null Comparison Toggle
61 ID: TFNFR12 - Category: Code Style - Dynamic for Optional Nested Objects
62 ID: TFNFR13 - Category: Code Style - Default Values with coalesce/try
63 ID: TFNFR14 - Category: Inputs - Not allowed variables
64 ID: TFNFR15 - Category: Code Style - Variable Definition Order Yes Yes if linting / avmfix check passed
65 ID: TFNFR16 - Category: Code Style - Variable Naming Rules Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
66 ID: TFNFR17 - Category: Code Style - Variables with Descriptions Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
67 ID: TFNFR18 - Category: Code Style - Variables with Types Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
68 ID: TFNFR19 - Category: Code Style - Sensitive Data Variables
69 ID: TFNFR20 - Category: Code Style - Non-Nullable Defaults for collection values
70 ID: TFNFR21 - Category: Code Style - Discourage Nullability by Default Yes Yes if linting / avmfix check passed
71 ID: TFNFR22 - Category: Code Style - Avoid sensitive = false Yes Yes if linting / avmfix check passed
72 ID: TFNFR23 - Category: Code Style - Sensitive Default Value Conditions Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
73 ID: TFNFR24 - Category: Code Style - Handling Deprecated Variables NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
74 ID: TFNFR25 - Category: Code Style - Verified Modules Requirements Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
75 ID: TFNFR26 - Category: Code Style - Providers in required_providers Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
76 ID: TFNFR27 - Category: Code Style - Provider Declarations in Modules Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
77 ID: TFNFR28 - Category: Code Style - Provider Declarations in Modules Yes Yes if linting / terraform check passed
78 ID: TFNFR29 - Category: Code Style - Sensitive Data Outputs Yes Yes if linting / avmfix check passed
79 ID: TFNFR30 - Category: Code Style - Handling Deprecated Outputs NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
80 ID: TFNFR31 - Category: Code Style - locals.tf for Locals Only
81 ID: TFNFR32 - Category: Code Style - Alphabetical Local Arrangement Yes Yes if linting / avmfix check passed
82 ID: TFNFR33 - Category: Code Style - Precise Local Types
83 ID: TFNFR34 - Category: Code Style - Using Feature Toggles NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
84 ID: TFNFR35 - Category: Code Style - Reviewing Potential Breaking Changes NA Module Owner to action this spec post-publish as appropriate
85 ID: TFNFR36 - Category: Code Style - Setting prevent_deletion_if_contains_resources
86 ID: TFNFR37 - Category: Code Style - Tool Usage by Module Owner
microsoft-github-policy-service[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!WARNING] Tagging the AVM Core Team (@Azure/avm-core-team-technical-terraform) due to a module owner or contributor having not responded to this issue within 3 business days. The AVM Core Team will attempt to contact the module owners/contributors directly.

[!TIP]

  • To prevent further actions to take effect, the "Status: Response Overdue 🚩" label must be removed, once this issue has been responded to.
  • To avoid this rule being (re)triggered, the ""Needs: Triage :mag:" label must be removed as part of the triage process (when the issue is first responded to)!