Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I can't reproduce this. If I set the number of Drones in Final to 10, then
run, it correctly results in 10 Drones being created. If I then stop the
simulation, change that number to 15, then run, it correctly produces 15
Drones. Loading from the History works as expected too. You have to
right-click on the History entry, then click "Load" in order to properly load
it. Simply clicking on the entry only displays the final build order in the
right-hand pane...it doesn't populate the waypoint fields.
Original comment by mike.angstadt
on 2 Dec 2010 at 2:12
Perhaps that's what I'm doing then. I'll continue using and if I think I've
come across it again I will be sure to find what exact parameters reproduce it.
Thanks
Original comment by jlamar...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2010 at 2:40
Thanks jlamar. This is definitely a big problem if there's a particular
situation where this happens.
Original comment by mike.angstadt
on 2 Dec 2010 at 2:43
This is likely the same as Issue 144, probably should be merged.
It is specifically that waypoint goals will be carried to the final goal *if
there is no final goal for that unit*.
e.g.:
waypoint 0: 20 zerglings
final: 20 banelings
Expected final goal: 20 banelings
Actual final goal: 20 zerglings 20 banelings:
or, to prove it isn't just lings
Waypoint 0: 30 drones
Final: 50 zerglings 20 spinecrawlers
Expected final: 50 zerglings, 20 spine crawlers, and 10-15 drones
Actual final: 50 zerglings, 20 spine crawlers, 30 drones, and 400 minerals
banked.
An excerpt from the BO for the above:
-------Goal-------
Drones: 30
Zerglings: 50
Bases: 1
Spine Crawlers: 20
Minerals: 544 Gas: 0
Note the 30 drones showing in the final goal.
The build order actually creates all 50 drones before morphing 20 into spine
crawlers.
Original comment by kel.bolden@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2010 at 3:00
Good point. I think I was doing baneling builds when I experienced the issue. I
will test more with that and see if that's what I saw.
Original comment by jlamar...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2010 at 4:09
Merging into issue #144
Original comment by netpr...@gmail.com
on 19 Jul 2011 at 7:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jlamar...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2010 at 5:54