Closed juanjo255 closed 2 months ago
Hi @juanjo255 ,
Thank you for your interest in chewBBACA. The difficulty in obtaining a unique identifier from a genome based MLST method is the potential missing data (i.e. loci which are in the schema but not present in all isolates). If we consider a strict cgMLST, i.e. including loci present in 100% of the strains this could be overcome, but we would probably end up with a much reduced number of loci. If we consider the dataset in question and not the entire species, the cgMLST will be much larger and discriminant but any ST-like identifiers will not be applicable in other contexts.
There are a number of solutions to this problem with LIN codes having gained some acceptance.
Hope to have helped.
Mario
Dr. @ramirma ,
It was very clear.
Thank you very much for the explanation,
Juan
Hello @rfm-targa,
Is there a way to get the ST from cgMLST as with MLST? Can you help me understand why its common to get notation from MLST but not from cgMLST?
Thank you for the help,
Juan