B95krk MDM issues - Githubissues

B95krk / MDM

1 stars 0 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

BANK_BRANCH_TH field displays duplicate data.

#53 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
BANK_NAME_TH field displays duplicate data.

#52 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In UI layer, LOCATION_CODE field should only contain numbers.

#51 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In UI layer, VAT_REG_NO should allow as 13 - 20 digits. (Ref. Varaporn email 6-Jun)

#50 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In UI layer, GROUP_KEY field should only contain numbers.

#49 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In UI layer, TAX_ID field should not contain more than 13 characters. (Ref. Varaporn email 6-Jun)

#48 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In UI layer, BU Plant fields should not contain special characters

#47 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Who delete my issue description ?

#46 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Using CREDIT_ACCOUNT (credit limit account KNKLI) as a heading instead of CREDIT_LIMIT (KLIMK)

#45 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Add 'Company Name' in Company View as one of filter attribute. (Now we have only Company Name in General View as filter attribute)

#44 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
For Company Name in general view For Initial data, this field should be null For Incremental data, this field should have value (From Kissflow) Ref. consolidated file v.2.5

#43 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Duplicate record "บริษัท ร่ำรวย ร่ำรวย จำกัด" More details in sheet 23

#42 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Error when create report New -> Report -> Create report More details in sheet 22

#41 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
How to edit dashboard name ? More details in sheet 21

#40 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
What is the person data ? More details in sheet 20

#39 B95krk closed 2 months ago
2
What does it mean "job fail" ? Is it impact for coding or data issue ? More details in sheet 19 Impact Kissflow - MDM UAT activity !!

#38 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Why validation fail 2276 record ? What is the solution to solve this issue ? LW found this issue on SIT or not ? More details in sheet 18.

#37 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Customer show only 10,000 records but real data of customer is 19xxx records

#36 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
The data in MDM does not match the data in SAP (the WHT Type View information is present in MDM but missing in SAP).

#35 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
K.Korakot will fill in details of this issue soon BTW, LW can ignore this issue during this time, as i (Ging) have a quick discuss with K.Korakot, this is data issue from PTG ends (related to STREET5 attribute that MDM didn't use, based on Andes metadata working file) 10/06/24 : korakot In the SAP system, the information entered in the Street 4 field of the Street Address does not match the Mapping document (the Mapping document specifies that the Street 4 field must contain information related to 'Road').

#34 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Not require Inco Term 2 value when create new customer in MDM (After checking in SAP program, actually this attribute is not required in SAP for all kind of customer)

#33 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
House number field, The building information is incomplete.

#32 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Need clarification, how MDM obtains the Departure Zone/Route ID for each customer.

#31 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Duplicate info. is shown in UI (2 places to identify Contact Type.)

#30 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Tax ID contains an alphabet, but DQ_VALIDATION is passed.

#29 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Incorrect Region value

#28 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Field Deletion Flag All Areas: Should be show value list only Delete & Undelete.

#27 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Can MDM make UI to be more friendly, especially if there are a lot of data - 1 plant with many Departure zone and Route ID View : no need to repeat 'Departure zone and Route ID View' 1-2-3-... - 1 plant with many Partner Function View (under each Sale Area) : no need to repeat 'Partner Function ID View' 1-2-3-...

#26 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Baseline Date = Fixed Date in MDM, Fixed Date: shows the value as blank, but Baseline Date = Fixed Date in SAP shows the value as 0.

#25 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Create New Customer : In case of Account group Z090 (AR STO), Z091 (AR Ship-to), no need to input Tax ID, Branch Number, Branch Name, VAT Registration Number

#24 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
SAP has data, but Company, Sort Key, Recon Account and Pay Term CoCd aren't shown in MDM

#23 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
How MDM displays data in the UI. (How data is sorted, because user discovered that the data does not sort by alphabet or code)

#22 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Partner Function data in MDM isn't aligned with data in SAP (no customer name displayed for some partner function) 14-June-24 :QA : In the Partner Function View, the Customer Name and Customer Number sections on MDM do not match those on SAP.

#21 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Field Event Type & Request Type duplicate value on page "Create New Customer"

#20 B95krk closed 2 months ago
2
Entered value 52011100 for Material group in filter section and received an error. The list of Material group values in filter section is incomplete, even though the values, such as 52011100, are present in the actual data.

#19 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Unable to import the file (successful in transform step, but not in load step).

#18 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
1. When a user sends a request for approval, where can they view the pending tasks (tasks awaiting approval), especially if they cannot remember the primary key (e.g., material code)? 2. When approver clicks 'Reject' on a task, the task disappears. Is there any notification or history that PTG can trace back, or can the requester know that their task has been rejected?

#17 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In material domain, for fields that we retrieve data from SAP, users expect the latest data from SAP to be updated in MDM. Example: Originally from SAP, Base Gross Weight: 0.00 15-Aug: User manually edits the value of Base Gross Weight to 25.0 only in MDM UI, with no change in SAP. 16-Aug: LW runs the incremental job. Expected result: Base Gross Weight should be 0.00 (same as SAP data) Current result: Base Gross Weight is still 25.0 Note: - For attributes that do not exist in SAP (data source isn't SAP, ex. IMAGE_URL), MDM is ranked as the primary data source. - For attributes that exist in SAP (data source is SAP, ex. BASE_GROSS_WEIGHT), SAP should be ranked as the primary data source.

#16 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Users are unable to verify the correctness of mat-plant relationship egress file because the data size (number of records) exceeds Excel's display limit (more than 1,048,576 records). Therefore, PTG is requesting that LW support by 1. extracting only the relationships with plants of the following listed materials: 200001370, 200001762, 210010043, 210010146, 230010029, 230010032, 250000891, 250001089, 250001096. 2. Provide no. of records of file (full version)

#15 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Didn't have field MATERIAL_TYPE_NAME on MDM UI Added explanation: Currently, we have MATERIAL_TYPE attribute, which is reference value from ZVMAT_GENERAL. However, PTG also wants MATERIAL_TYPE_NAME_TH attribute to be included in MDM, with the source of its value coming from ZVMAT_ZTMM_UPDTE.

#14 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
In the filter section, the format of list of values should match the format of values in details tab. For example, in the filter section, 'Base Unit ID' displays as 'Ea-Each,' while in details tab, it shows as 'EA-each. PTG expects this field in the filter section to display as 'EA-each' (code in uppercase, name in lowercase). --------------------------------------------- Updated on 19-Aug: PTG wants to apply the same concept from issue no. 12 to other attributes as well, so that the format of list of values in filter section is same as the format of values in details tab. Material Type, Sale Org, Item Catergory Group, BU ID, Sub BU ID (code in uppercase, name in lowercase).

#13 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Assigning new searchable/filter attributes in material, as we have now assigned some searchable/filter attributes in SLOC/ACCOUNTING/PLANT attribute groups (grey highlighted, not in MDM) SEARCHABLE WH_CODE ZONE_CODE FILTER BU_ID SUB_BU_ID

#12 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
[Searchable attribute] When trying to search in MDM UI using value of CREATE_DATE (which is a searchable attribute), the results isn't displayed as expected

#11 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
[Filter attributes] No 'DELETE_FOR_SALES_DATA' displayed in filter attributes on MDM UI

#10 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Double field "Cost Price"

#9 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
[Filter attributes] Can the material type field be moved to the top position?

#8 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
[Filter attributes] Record status indicator field is not specified in test case but is present in MDM.

#7 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Remove the heading text for form design (with only 1 attribute in the section) if the material has more than one sub bu value.

#6 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Remove the heading text for table design if the material has more than one set of purchasing data.

#5 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1
Tax Classification Material Name displayed in UI do not match SAP TSKMT table.

#4 B95krk closed 2 months ago
1

Previous Next