BAMWelDX / weldx

The welding data exchange format
https://www.bam.de/weldx
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
20 stars 10 forks source link

v0.6.2 #822

Closed CagtayFabry closed 1 year ago

CagtayFabry commented 1 year ago

Changes

prepare 0.6.2 release

create release PR

Merge the Pull Request

add Git(hub) tag

ReadTheDocs update

pypi release

conda-forge release

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

Test Results

2 184 tests  ±0   2 183 :heavy_check_mark: ±0   2m 31s :stopwatch: -32s        1 suites ±0          1 :zzz: ±0         1 files   ±0          0 :x: ±0 

Results for commit f13a0bc6. ± Comparison against base commit cfac317d.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Merging #822 (f13a0bc) into master (e6f7d6a) will increase coverage by 0.44%. The diff coverage is 99.12%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #822      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.80%   97.25%   +0.44%     
==========================================
  Files          81       82       +1     
  Lines        5380     4913     -467     
==========================================
- Hits         5208     4778     -430     
+ Misses        172      135      -37     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
weldx/geometry.py 96.61% <ø> (ø)
weldx/welding/groove/iso_9692_1.py 99.52% <ø> (ø)
weldx/core/math_expression.py 98.50% <98.50%> (ø)
weldx/core/spatial_series.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
weldx/core/generic_series.py

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

CagtayFabry commented 1 year ago

RTD nosedived into timeout from this build (working) to this one (timeout)

no idea why, here is the diff https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/pull/822/files/380909012841d5c898e0d3564b6a7d38390ee103..3535791f379354787732d151d594b71d0455a720

the conda installs seem identical (also with the github action run)... 🤔 https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/actions/runs/3396067849/jobs/5646712658

CagtayFabry commented 1 year ago

I have removed the internal links in get_groove @marscher I am not sure why the github action docs build is still failing, I cannot reproduce locally (it ran through in this action run)

I think this is ok for now