BAMWelDX / weldx

The welding data exchange format
https://www.bam.de/weldx
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
19 stars 9 forks source link

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #859

Closed pre-commit-ci[bot] closed 1 year ago

pre-commit-ci[bot] commented 1 year ago

updates:

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Merging #859 (9be4882) into master (51fd46f) will decrease coverage by 0.10%. The diff coverage is 36.84%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.56%   96.47%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          95       95              
  Lines        6227     6235       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         6013     6015       +2     
- Misses        214      220       +6     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
weldx/measurement.py 95.62% <0.00%> (ø)
weldx/tags/core/mathematical_expression.py 96.66% <0.00%> (ø)
weldx/transformations/cs_manager.py 98.60% <ø> (ø)
weldx/util/util.py 89.65% <38.46%> (-3.78%) :arrow_down:
weldx/asdf/util.py 90.88% <50.00%> (ø)
weldx/transformations/local_cs.py 96.35% <50.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

Test Results

2 187 tests  ±0   2 186 :heavy_check_mark: ±0   2m 31s :stopwatch: -35s        1 suites ±0          1 :zzz: ±0         1 files   ±0          0 :x: ±0 

Results for commit 9be48828. ± Comparison against base commit 51fd46f4.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

marscher commented 1 year ago

There is one thing left where Ruff and deepsource.io (probably flake8) disagree: an unused import which was marked as ignore. But Ruff thinks the ignore is not mandatory, while flake8 thinks it is.