Open srosenbu opened 4 months ago
Probably don't need extra measure anymore since Spaces know what quadrature rule they have
I was not aware of that. Does the space infer this information from the basix element? Could you maybe provide the source, I would be interested in that :)
Apart, from the things you mentioned I currently do not see any problems.
I was not aware of that. Does the space infer this information from the basix element? Could you maybe provide the source, I would be interested in that :)
Ok, I thought I had read that someehwre, but I can't find it anymore and I am now thinking that I just hoped for this feature :D But I think it should theoretically be possible to implement since the Quadrature spaces know which quadrature rule they have. So, I would need to try some stuff with 0.8 and then we could maybe suggest this feature to the dolfinx team
Dolfinx 0.8.0 will introduce some new features that may break some of our code, but also will make some parts of our current code obsolete. I would like to collect these issues here in the thread before we start the next hackathon;)
VectorFunctionSpace
,TensorFunctionSpace
anymore, and you will be supposed to initialize spaces with a functiondf.fem.functionspace
QuadratureRule
can be removed.basix
expr.eval(...)
and theQuadratureEvaluator
class can be removed@pdiercks , @aradermacher , @div-tyg , @danielandresarcones do you remember any other problems that we had in the last hackathon?